Deer Creek - Conference Center - Sterling, OH - Transcription - Part 3
Deer Creek Conference 1985 - Part 3 (60-90 min)
Stanley A. Meyer - Sterling, OH 1985 · Part 3 of 5 · Minutes 60-90
Hydrogen Gas Transport and Economics
[60:01] ambientAmbient airair, right? As a resultresult, I am now producing non-combustible gases right?gases. I'm now mixing
[60:07] non-combustible gas with the hydrogen gas and now controlling its mixedmix raterate, and therefore
[60:12] I can now can transport the hydrogen gas in any existing gas line extremely economically. Now with
[60:19] one little open flameflame, how many hundreds of thousands of millions of cubic feet of ambient air
[60:25] could I process very quickly in order to accomplish a task? Quite a lotlot, right? Now if I'm using the
[60:31] generator to produce the high high-temperature flameflame, I've joineddone it extremely economical. Thereforeeconomically.
[60:37] Therefore, I am now using the capabilities characteristicand characteristics of ambient air intoin the process. I'm using water,
[60:43] voltage,voltage, and ambient air. Any of these commodities doesn't cost me very muchmuch, does it? I'm also using
[60:49] non-reactive materials which are non-replaceable — therefore it's not costcosting me anythinganything, is it?
Consumer Cost Savings of the Water Fuel Cell
[60:56] Now if I don't have to change the internal combustion engine the— to retrofit the one youyou're call
[61:00]running on hydrogen — is that you as a consumerconsumer, is it going to cost you twovery minutes mymuch money? NoNo, it's only
[61:06] going to cost you as a retrofit system tofor the fuel cell. The fuel cell technology in itself is the
[61:13] first time that you'll be able to buy a system it'that'll save you money. You knowknow, if you run your car
[61:19] 100,000 miles down the road on gasolinegasoline, it's going to cost you roughly around $14,000 to accomplish the task.
[61:25] accomplish a task. If we can release the fuel cell around $1,500500, utilize ordinary natural waterwater, take
[61:31] the difference of savings between $14,000 and $1,500 for the fuel cell.cell So— so the more you use the fuel
[61:36] cellcell, the more money that you're going to make because you're going to prevent and spending money.
[61:40] Well nownow, if you can take that difference between $1,500 and $14,000000, what could you not buy with it?
[61:48]In Aa couple yearsyears, you can buy a lotlot, right? That takes care now of the ability of rendering hydrogen
[61:54] safer than that of natural gas.
Hydrogen Recycling and Water Recovery
[61:54] Now we deal with anthe area of — can we go now for hydrogen andrecycling? recycling.
[62:02] Now everyEvery chemist and businessevery knowsperson you'rewho's goinggone through chemistry class butknows that when you're
[62:07]burning borrowing hydrogen and oxygen, the byproductsbyproduct is water misuse.mist. Now I could take the water mist
[62:13]mist, let it go in the atmosphereatmosphere, condense or— cool downit down, it condensecondenses and form aforms rain clouds — come back here
[62:18] and let it rainrain, and then you can pick up the water again and you can go ahead and then use it.
[62:25] The scripture says that in the end timetime, even the deserts will blossom. When I made a preliminary
[62:33] presentation to the nation of Egypt — when the Arab countries waswere trying to force Egypt back into the
[62:40] Arab fold to form a united front against the nation of Israel — the Lord had me right there to make the
[62:46] presentation to the minister of energy and educationeducation. andAnd when I walked out of the meeting
[62:52]meeting, there was a guy by the name of Mustafa that had tears in his eyeseyes. He was crying, and he wassaid, crying and he said stand
[62:56] he says"Stan, one thing that all Egyptians understand is that water is likelife to usus, and you're showing us the
[63:03] ability that we could take the MediterraneanMediterranean, convertedconvert it into fresh drinking water towater, irrigate
[63:08] the desert areasareas, and at the same time provide energy for industry." The scripture has foretold that in
[63:14] the end timetime, even the deserts will blossom.
Catalytic Block and Closed-Loop Water Condensation
[63:14] Now for those who have a hang hang-up on energy released
[63:21] from water — because you now can recapture the water — the Lord had me to develop what was called a
[63:29] catalytic block of stemleyassembly to eliminate any form of non-burnable gasesgases, to purify itit, so that we could now
[63:36] could condense the hydrogen and oxygen gas. I use a system here that the flame— if you rememberremember, back
[63:44] when I was a young kidkid, there was what was called a gasgas-fired firerefrigerator. refrigerator anyoneAnyone remember that?
[63:49] Taking an open flame and cool it coolcooling it. You know thatknow, when I was a kidkid, it was a phenomenal event
[63:57] to me to see a flame and saysay, how can you get how"How can you get an ice cube out of a flame.flame?"
[64:03] Same technology was used here — the ability to condense the hydrogen and oxygen gasgas, and it can
[64:09]do it at 5,000 degrees to do it extremely economicaleconomically without any mechanical moving parts.
[64:13] Taking the same form of technology that was developed 25 years agoago, this is a heat coil here
[64:20] that captures the flame or the heat from the flame. It heats the gas that goes through an
[64:24] expansion tubetube, and when it goes through anthe expansion tubetube, it now allows the gas to cool downdown, much like
[64:30] that of a refrigerator. It now cools down this catalytic block and in turn now gives us the ability
[64:35] to condense the water at a controlcontrolled rate — a recycling rate. Isn't that amazing? No mechanical moving part.parts.
[64:43] As a result of thisthis, we now have a closed closed-loop recycling system. Now because we're using high
[64:49] high-pulse voltage frequency with resonant cavity technologytechnology, if there's only so much energy available
[64:56] to you when you burn hydrogen and oxygen in the combustioncombustion, and you want to hook it up to an energy
[65:01] system greater than the mandemand of one gallon of waterwater, what do you do? You simply increase the rate of
[65:08] production of— the conversion of water. So if you need an energy demand three times greater than
[65:13]one gallon waterof water, control the rate to equal the conversion of three gallons of water per hour
[65:18] thenand you have now met your energy demand. Why? On theThe conservation law of energy it says when you
[65:24] convert energy ininto the massmass, or mass ofinto the energyenergy, do you lose anything? Don'You don't lose anything.
Hydrogen Fracturing and Atomic Energy from Water
[65:32] Now we go to another stage of evolution of technology. It's all right to use the hydrogen
[65:38] and oxygen planeplainly under combustioncombustion, but do you realize there is a phenomenal amount of energy
[65:44] andin a gallon of water? The Lord havehad me start working on the area of releasing the atomic
[65:54] energy yield from an ordinary gallon of water.
[65:54] Prior state of the art — if you'dve heard very recently
[66:00] thatrecently, Livermore Laboratories was working on what's called the hydrogen fusion process. The hydrogen fusion
[66:06] process strictly deals in the area of taking two hydrogen atoms — by the wayway, they need the fuel cell
[66:11] to produce the hydrogen economically — but they need two hydrogen atoms. They need to project the
[66:17] hydrogen atoms to a high temperaturetemperature, around 10 million degrees. You know how much energy it takes
[66:24] to produce 10 million degrees of energy? And then they subject the hydrogen
[66:31] atoms not only to this high temperature — 10 million degrees plus — but they subject it to high pressure.
[66:40]46] high pressure. And asAs a result of thatthat, scientists have been able to start to develop the process
[66:46] which is called hydrogen fusion. And Livermore comecame out and said that in their processprocess, they predict
[66:53]a andchance changeof the air so possibility of a pilot plantplant, and that the energy yield of 250 pounds of
[67:01] hydrogen was equivalent to how many 11 million well as well as 11 million barrels of oil.
[67:12] Under the hydrogen fracturing process that we are developingdeveloping, we can release theand control of the
[67:18] atomic energy from water at any rate we so desire. One gallon of water has roughly one
[67:23] pound of hydrogen to itit, so that would be an equivalent energy yield of 44,000 barrels of oil.
[67:33] Now that'll blow your mind. We also have the ability to break down the atomic yield of oxygen
[67:40] in the same processprocess, so the same estimated total energy yield for one gallon of water
[67:47] is equivalent to 108,000 barrels of oil. That's a lot of energyenergy, is it not?
Vector Graphics Analysis of Atomic Energy Release
[67:59] You will see it — one
[67:59] timetime, this is the control system to set up the ability onfor the hydrogen fracturing process.
[68:05] You ever see anything like that before? I asked the Lord in the experimentation to show me
[68:11] and faticallyemphatically what we havehave. weWe have thiswhat's called a vector graphics analysis. As you see it leaving
[68:17] the heat zonezone, you can see secondary and triple quadrupole explosions you can see it on different
[68:22] angular raterates. andAnd physicists know that when you release atomic energyenergy, there's a vector graph
[68:29]— a vector release of energy — and any physicist thatthat's that wasworth any salt can speedsee that we are releasing the
[68:35] atomic energy yield of an ordinary gallon of waterwater. andAnd I don't need 10 million degrees of temperature.
[68:41] Andand I don't need thousands of hundreds of thousands of millions of pounds of pressure in order to
[68:46] accomplish athe task. The process is totallytotally, completely non-radioactive. I do not use uranium 238 toor 235.
[68:53]— Anythinganything onof that form of an isotopeisotope. hasThe resultedresult is totally non-radioactive.
Global Energy Crisis and the Need for Stability
[68:59] Now the Lord said that this knowledge would be used in a time of great trouble to— knowledge
[69:05]a kind of time of great trouble but against battle and war. Right nownow, we need to stabilize the economy
[69:13] of the world becausebecause, why? Atat a very short period of timetime, if the energy problem is not smallsolved, we're
[69:19] going to war. The United States is spending over a billion dollars a year now to develop a task
[69:25] force capable of taking care of their particular interests over there in the mid-east.Middle East. And why do
[69:32] you think Russia is going to makeinto Afghanistan? And why do you think China is now is starting to mobilize
[69:37] becauseBecause they want the energy too?too.
[69:44] Because of the nuclear problems that we have hadhad, the world needs
[69:44] an answeranswer, and it needs it immediately. And youYou can go around and — within a period of 30 days.days, Ifif you
[69:52] don't think soso, you tell me if you can survive a faster 35 or 30 to 60 day fast. If the energy is
[70:01] cut off to the United StatesStates, where are you going to get the energy to grow the food? And if you grow
[70:06] hungryhungry, you're going to go to war. I don't care if you're the most passive man in the world — everybody
[70:11] on the on the face of this earth needs to satisfy one particular earthability: the ability to eat.
Star Wars Defense Program and Space Applications
[70:19] That's why in the pamphlet you will seesee, when you talk about a phenomenal amount of energy.energy Now— now in the
[70:23] Star Wars Development ProgramProgram, the waterWater fuelFuel cellCell relation to atomic energy is phenomenalphenomenal. becauseBecause you
[70:28]see, seethe United States is locked in an agreement with Russia that you cannot bring a nuclear power device
[70:33] ininto outer space. But because the fuel cell is non-radioactive — because we're releasing energy from water — we
[70:40]can now can utilize this as a fantastic ability to set up a global defense mechanism capable of
[70:49] stabilizing the world. So the Lord said this knowledge would be used against war. But in
[70:58] But in the final outcomeoutcome, in the hearts of men there's greed and there's power and there's evilnessevilness. So eventually, in the
[71:03] hearts of men so eventually in a battle of arm and gettingArmageddon, it will be used in that battle. And many
[71:10]Many people thought that inthe Scripturescripture that says that "the placeflesh will melt off the bones.bones" They— they thought that
[71:15] was a nuclear blast. NoNo, that's not truetrue, because the bombing of NakasakaNagasaki and Hiroshima that if you
[71:20] were exposed to ground zero area on out— if you were exposed to ground zero, your body vaporizedvaporized. it'It's a particle
[71:25] beam accelerator that's subjected to the people in the battle of Armageddon. I cannot hold that
[71:31] type of technology from being pervertedperverted, but I can use this technology to help stabilize the
[71:36] economic base of this country and give the military superiority back to the American people to help stabilize the world.
[71:43] stabilize the world becauseBecause if you look at the United StatesStates, we're the only country in the world
[71:48] that's stabilizing and preventing global war. It's not in our hearts to go to war. We had a technology
[71:54] back in World War II — the development of the atomic bomb — that we could have absolutely brought the
[72:00] needs of every country in the world down to their kneesknees, and we did not do that. No country in the
[72:07] world had the power that we had.
Water-Powered wiseRocket Engine and Space Station
[72:14] Technology-wise, this is the concept of development that you will
[72:14] see in a relatively startshort period of time and— NASA and development going on in outer space — the ability of
[72:19] utilizing the atomic energy from water to develop your rocket propulsion system. This is another
[72:26] advanced design that I'm working onon: inthe development of a water water-powered rocket engine that has the
[72:31] ability of producing the gas economicallyeconomically, releasing its atomic energyenergy, and it has a fantastic payload to it.
[72:37] to it. Why? When you look at scripturescripture, go back and look andat there's Zikl'Ezekiel's wheel. The only reason
[72:46] why we have not put a man'smanned satellite in outer space is because we have a logisticlogistics problem. The
[72:51] logisticlogistics problem being is that we can't transport standard fossil fuels ininto outer space economically
[73:02] butBut when you're talking about a fuel cell technology releasing phenomenal amount of
[73:07]a phenomenal amount of energy in a controlcontrolled state — I meanmean, 108,000 barrels of oil is quite a lot of
[73:12] energyenergy, right? You can sustain and maintain a space station in outer space sospace, just exactly as a Zikl
[73:21]Ezekiel had prophesied — that in the end timetime, you will see the man'smanned satellite will now be put out there andthere.
[73:27] And when you look at its designdesign, look at scripture. When you look at an American space stationstation, look
[73:33] at scripturesthe scriptures, and you will see a wheel within a wheel — and that will be the power supply that will provide that.
Live Demonstration: Filling the Fuel Cell
[73:39] now provide that. But who is the gentleman who filled this fuel cell out?up? You did. Have you seen me
[73:44] before today? Have you ever talked to me before today? Good. I always I believe too— this is a very
[73:51] powerful thingthing, you know what— no matter what anyone else says, truth or always prevailsprevails. soSo I always like
[73:55] to get somebody involved in this that I have no part in doingdoing.
[74:02] Now let me ask you some
[74:02] embarrassing questionsquestions, if I may. What did you put in this fuel cell? What did you get it out of?
[74:10]The Sinksink out of the back room. Did you fill this up with ordinary natural water?
[74:14]Okay. Okay nowNow, did you process this water in any way? ItYou didn't process it in any wayway, shapeshape, or fashion
[74:20]fashion, right? Did you add any chemicals to this system? ItYou didn't. OkayOkay, now — if this guy's lyinglying, you get to beat him up.
Prior Art vs. the Water Fuel Cell Process
[74:27] to beat him up. OkayOkay, as I saidsaid, I believe truth is a very powerful thingthing, and what no matter what
[74:33] anyone sayssays, truth will always prevail. Now the prior studystate of the art says to produce any form of
[74:37]hydrogen hydrogengas, gas youyou've got to have tosealed sealwater, water youyou've got to fill this up between here to here with a chemical
[74:42] additive such as sodium hydroxide toor potassium hydroxidehydroxide, you have to put a phenomenal amount of
[74:47] amps into the systemsystem, and inas thata result isresult, you produce a very low gas fuel. Now as we pointedyield.
[74:53] Now as we pointed out in our presentation thepresentation, water is a free energy showsource — this is not — and if I don't have to process
[74:59] the water in any wayway, does it cost me anything? If I don't have to package the water in any way
[75:05]way, does it cost me anything? ThereforeTherefore, water is a very economical source of fuel if you can release the hydrogen and oxygen atoms economically, right?
Live Demonstration: Voltage Influencing Water Dissociation
[75:10]16] the hydrogen oxygen atom economically right? Now over herehere, we have a little apparatus that
[75:16] allows the voltage to take over and restrict the amps in it. Now for those who have never seen the
[75:21] process or have not seen the processprocess, come on up — I'd like to show this and demonstrate it to you.
[75:33] Now what we're going to do here is to actually show thatthat, in fact thatfact, by
[75:38] rejecting the amps ourand letting voltage take overover, that voltage does in fact influence the disassociation
[75:43]dissociation of the water molecule. Now under the prior state of the art saysart, the only the average potential
[75:49] of a fuel cell was around two voltsvolts, and then youyou'd stocksock in as many amps as you possibly cancan. because
[75:54]Because when you put an electrolyte in the water now— the purpose for the electrolyte is that the stilldistilled water
[75:58] is an insulator to the flow of DC currentcurrent, so they have to add an electrolyte to the water in order to
[76:04] electrify the waterit, to allow amp flow to go into the system. So automatically a amp device or
[76:10] So automatically, an amp device or electrolysis process is a dead dead-short condition — it operates in a dead dead-short condition — and because
[76:16] of thatthat, it will not allow voltage to come up. It'sIt suckedsucks in as muchmany amps as it possibly can.
[76:20] So under the prior state of the artart, at around two volts potentialpotential, you can see that there's a form of hydrogen gas being developed.
[76:25] of hydrogen gas being developed. Now I'm going to now adjust the attenuation of voltage amplitude
[76:31] upwardupward, and I'm going to adjust it to such an extent that only allow just the hydrogen and oxygen
[76:38] gases are now to bebeing developed. NowNow, you see these gases coming up? You're now producing hydrogen and
[76:44] oxygen gas andby the most economical means. Now I'm going to use you as aan experimenter here.here — I want
[76:49] you to put your hands on there and tell me if that's a cold or hot process. Is it cold or hot? Cold.
[76:53]
Voltage Cold.Zone Okay now if you can sit downSpacing and thenGas I'mProduction going to have you come back up and forth. Now leavingRate
[76:57] Now, leaving the power supply exactly constant — if I were newnarrow the voltage zonezones inwardinward, I'm leaving the electronics
[77:04] exactly constant now.constant. The only parameter that I'm changing is the physical parameter of the voltage
[77:10] zone. So I'm going to adjust the voltage down because I'm producing it too high.high The— the purpose is
[77:15] just to show you the phenomena. Now leaving the I'm going to adjust downward. Leaving the electronics
[77:22] Now, leaving the electronics exactly constant.constant, Thethe only parameter I'm changing is the physical parameter. As you bring the voltage
[77:26] zones inin, that influences the disassociationdissociation of the water molecule even faster. So as I do this now
[77:32]now, tell me if the hydrogen and gas is being increased.
[77:35] Let me do it again now.
[77:43] Reverse — all coming in this way. All rightright, now when I move the voltage zones backwardsbackwards, tell me if the
[77:48] hydrogen and gas slows down. JustIt slowjust slowed down. All rightright, now moving the physical parameters
[77:53] together againagain, tell me if the hydrogen and oxygen gas being generated is now being speededsped up.
[77:59] ThatSo in factfact, slows in fact the voltage does influence the disassociationdissociation of the water molecule
[78:04] andAnd when we presentpresented this to the examiner chiefs of the United States Patent Office for Rule 101
[78:08] showing operabilityof operability, they stated in fact that there was no other formerform operatistof operation that we needed to
[78:12] show — that voltage does influence the disassociationdissociation of the water molecule. Now as a counter proof to
[78:17] thisNow as a counter-proof to this, we move the voltage zones backwards to oneone-inch end spacingspacing, and I now should be able to
[78:22] attenuate the voltage upward and— increase the voltage upwards — to increase hydrogen gas generation.
[78:28] I'm going to raise it up a little bitbit. and tellTell me if the hydrogen gas speededsped up.
[78:32] It speededsped up. All rightright, now I'm going to lower the voltage downdown. and tellTell me if it slows down. It slowed down.
[78:38] Slow down. All rightright, now I'm going to adjust it up again. Now you see any hidden tubes or anything
[78:43] in the apparatus? This is ordinary little 18 18-gauge wirewire, by the way. It speededsped up.
[78:49] Now let's put your hands in there and tell me that'— is that a cold or hot process? It's a cold hotprocess, process.right?
[78:54] It's a cold process right? Under the prior state of the artsart, if you trytried to generate any form of
[78:58]hydrogen hydrogengas, gas.you'd Yousock sawin a tremendous amount of amps. When you put the voltage zones together
[79:01]together, this starts turning cherry cherry-red hot. It actually createdcreates a dead dead-short condition and would just start fusing everything together.
Demonstrating Hydrogen Flame and Energy Release
[79:07] everything together. Okay nowNow over herehere, to show you another form of the— we are not
[79:14] demonstrating in this to you under the ideal conditionconditions. allAll we want to do is to show you basic
[79:19] principles — that we have solved the engineering design interfacing capabilities of utilizing
[79:24] ordinary natural water as a new energy source. Now if I can sustain a hydrogen and oxygen
[79:30] flame well over 5,000 degrees under controla statecontrolled state, then it's quite obvious that I'm releasing energy
[79:35] from water thatthat, if you shoveshoved it into a carburetorcarburetor, you could actually run a car down the road on water, right?
Pulse Frequency Generator from a Car Alternator
[79:40]45] water right? NowNow, I have over herehere, as we mentioned earlier that this isearlier, a possible leastpulse frequency
[79:45] generator. It's actually a car alternator. When you deregulate a car alternatoralternator, it becomes a voltage
[79:51] device. Now as I pointed outout, you go to your local nationwideNationwide parts dealer and you buy a little black
[79:55] box that can convert the alternator from 12 volts up to 110 voltsvolts, and you can operate it as a voltage
[80:01] device. An alternator was developed as a voltage device and it was restricted down to voltage
[80:06] regulation as an amp device.
[80:12] Now, this car alternator is actually now as a possible least
[80:12]pulse frequency generatorgenerator, created by eliminating the voltage regulation. Over here we have a transformer.
[80:19] We're only going to allow 5 volts at just the 5 volts at 2 amps across the field of this
[80:27] alternator. Now that's only 10 watts of electrical energy. On a maximum duty loading of an alternator
[80:32]alternator, you would put 12 volts ofat 10 ampsamps, or 120 wattswatts, across the field of the alternator.field. If you remember
[80:37] nowremember, I said that if you restrict the field backwards and only allow the magnetic field just across the
[80:43] pickup coils of that possible leastpulse frequency generatorgenerator, you will restrict the answeramps — I wanted
[80:47]the voltage to take over — because amp brawldraw cannot go any greater than that of the strength of the magnetic field.
[80:52] field. Now you'll see herehere, if you look at the pulley wheels of this alternator thatalternator, it's attached
[80:59] to this electric motormotor, and the pulley wheel will turn or— this motor will turn this possible
[81:04] leastpulse frequency generator at or slightly less than the speed of your car. It is not turning inat maximum
[81:10] rpm.RPM. Now on a maximum duty loading of 12 volts at 10 ampsamps, or 120 watts of electrical energy
[81:17] into a car alternatoralternator, it would take a 7 7-horsepower motor in order to turn the alternator. That's a
[81:23] one and a one-and-a-half horsepower electric horse motor. There's no way in the world that that alternator is turning at maximum duty RPM.
Three Capabilities to Demonstrate
[81:27] at maximum duty rpm. Now let's see what we can do with an ordinary car alternator converted into a
[81:34] pulse hold each frequency generator. Number oneone: can we demonstrate the ability of producing a hydrogen
[81:40] and oxygen gas economically.economically? Second area wasarea: the ability to develop the ability toand control the
[81:46] hydrogen gas on demand. Third area wasarea: adjust the burn rate of hydrogen to co-equal that of fossil
[81:54] fuelfuel, and do it under lawthe laws of economics.economics The— the guy who's doing it the most economical way is going to win out.
[81:58]82:03] win out. Maestro I want you to notice — see if there's any hoses or anything around there. You see any
[82:03] of that.any? There's hoses. All rightright, I'm going to have Charlie now barely adjust. We'll start it slow
[82:12]— it's harder to start slow than this fast. Now see the hydrogen and oxygen gas being produced.produced? I want
[82:19] you to put your hands on here and tell me if it's cold or hot. Tell me if that's cold or hot.
[82:26] Tell me if it's cold or hot. It's a cold processprocess, right.
Controlling yourHydrogen hands.Production Rate with Voltage
[82:32] All rightright, now here's your
[82:32] pulse and here's your answer.amps. I'm going to allow Charlie to adjust to the five volts around two
[82:37] amps. I want you to look at here and see if we can now can control the rate of hydrogen production.
[82:42] Watch this. I'll figure out.
[82:46] Did it increase? You see an increase in it? All right. What's your voltage?
[82:54]voltage? About five volts.volts About— about four volts. What's your amps?
[82:58] That's two amps. WeWe're knowrunning around two amps are— about eight watts of power going ininto the alternator.
[83:05] Now when you look at the gauge here — you see the gauge.gauge? That gauge is not anin ounces.
[83:12] Dillman it'It's in pounds of pressure. It's not anin ounce.ounces. I want you to look at the gauge if you
[83:17] will come up and I want you to look at the gauge and tell me what pounds of hydrogen we have right
[83:23] right now. OkayOkay, now I want you to look at the rate of the needle, the speed at which the needle's
[83:28] moving nowmoving, and I want to have Charlie up the voltage and tell me if the needle will speed up.
[83:35] Now watch it now. OhOh, I'm sorry.sorry — I'm gonnagoing to lower it. Did it slow down? Okay now I want you to look at
[83:44] the needle now and tell me if it's moving at a constant rate. Is it moving at a constant rate?
[83:50] All right I'm gonna have Charlie now up the voltage and tell me if the needle will speed up.
[83:55] The speed up? All rightOkay, now I want you to look at the needle and tell me if it's moving at a constant
[84:01]rate. Is it moving at a constant rate? All right, I'm going to have Charlie now up the voltage and tell me if the needle will speed up. Did it speed up? All right, now I want you to look at the needle and tell me if it's moving at a constant rate. All right put your hand on hereright, put your hand on here and tell me it's— is it cold or hot.hot?
[84:14] Was it instantaneous? I want Charlie to do this again.
[84:18] He's gonnagoing to illustrate that this constantis manproducing doesenergy so fast with producing the energyfast, we are now
[84:22] consuming it.it instantly. I want you to look at this as an instantaneous responsibility.
[84:29]response. Should we start up again? All rightright, again — tell me if that's cold or hot.
[84:35] What poundage are we at? About eight and a halfhalf, gogoing up to nine poundspounds, right? OnUnder athe prior state of
[84:41]the yardart, you would stocksock himin between 2,500 to 3,000 amps to try to do what we're doing on next to nothing.
[84:46] This would totallytotally, completely turn cherry cherry-red hothot, become super super hothot, and the water would
[84:51] start to vaporize and the plates would sortshort out the entire system.
Sustaining Hydrogen Flame Over 5,000 Degrees
[84:57] Now we demonstrate the third
[84:57] capability iscapability: the ability to adjust the burnerburn rate of hydrogen andto coagulateco-equal that of fossil fuel. Do you
[85:02] you feel any any gas coming out of there? Come on up herehere, I want you to put your hand on there
[85:08] tellTell me — you feel any gas coming out of there.there? WellWell, how can gas come out of therethere? youYou don'didn't put water in it, right?
[85:14] in it right? Okay nownow, when you burn it's right now when you burn hydrogen, you cannot see it or smell
[85:21] it or taste it — it's a very clean clean-burning fuel. You're going to see a small part of the flameflame. don'Don't let
[85:26] that powderfool you — it's well over 5,000 degreesdegrees. theThe part of the flame ityou see is just be is the ambient air
[85:31] that's being mixed with athe hydrogen and oxygen gas to support a pure hydrogen and oxygen flame
[85:37]flame, which is well over 5,000 degrees. OkayOkay, that's it.
[85:48] See it'sit therethere? turnTurn to that now. NowNow, you see a flame? Now youyou're wouldn't seewitnessing, for the first time
[85:55]time, in a true scientific terminologyterminology, the ability of burning ordinary natural water. Now we're
[86:01] sustaining the production of hydrogen gas at the same rate ofas the generator.
Melting Metal with a Water-Derived Flame
[86:08] Now we are adjusting
[86:08] the hydrogen and burn rate automatically down to around 47 centimeters a second. Now what Charlie
[86:13] is doing is taking an ordinary paperclip that has a high high-mill alloy in itit, and as you seesee, seethe that
[86:19] hydrogen and flame is actually melting that paperclip. Now it's not the size of the flame that
[86:25] counts — it's the amount of energy that's being released from the flame. Charlie's taking the
[86:30] Charlie's taking the match and trying to explodeexpose it to the paperclippaperclip. itIt would take a flame well over 200 times greater
[86:35] in spicesize and energy capacity to get it to athe point of trying to melt it. Now if you don't bleedbelieve meme, go
[86:40] home and take a butane torch and try to do the woodsame drilldrill. withWith ordinary natural water
[86:45] andwater, we're releasing the energy onin oura controlcontrolled state.
[86:50] Now I want thisyou to come in here if you— put
[86:50] your hands on the fuel cell and tell me if it's cold or hot. It's a cold processprocess, right?
[86:56] OnUnder the prior state of the art that afterart, as I pointed out to youyou, thatthey'd the socketsock in 25002,500 to 3000
[87:01]3,000 amps due to thedo what we're doing basically on very low energy input ininto the system.
Water as a Gas Mixing Regulator
[87:07] Now there's an outfit out in California that's been trying to duplicate our process
[87:11] ofwith an apparatus that costscost well over a million and a half dollars to do this.
[87:15] We are using the water as a gas mixing regulator and producing the energy on the man basisdemand, and as
[87:20] you seesee, Charlie can take it and use it as a virtually as a cutting torch.
[87:26] Now we're going to
[87:26] demonstrate thatthat, because we're using the water as a gas mixing regulatorregulator, we can maintain the
[87:34] combustion rate of the hydrogen gas regardless of the generator. Put the turn lights back out so
[87:42] we can demonstrate this. NowNow, to demonstrate this— is that hydrogen burns in a very narrow window
[87:48]window, but because we're using the water as a gas mixing regulatorregulator, we can control the combustion rate of
[87:53] the hydrogen gas regardless of the rate of the generator.
[87:57] Now I'm having Charlie loweringlower the
[87:57] voltage, and as a resultresult, you're going to see the flame go downwarddownward, but the flame is maintained.
[88:03] Now this is very importantimportant, because we can maintain the combustion rate regardless of the rate of
[88:08] the generator. We can now can hook it up to your carcar, or hook it up to the furnacefurnace, so we canor hook it up
[88:13] to some other form of energy device and know that we're going to maintain that combustion rate
[88:18]Under underthe prior steadystate artof the art, that was totally impossible. NowNow, see the flame going down?
[88:24] Now I'm going to have Charlie up the voltage, and now you're going to see that the hydrogen flame is
[88:29] increasing. Now mind you nowyou, I'm saying that we are demonstrating this under the worst conditions
[88:34]conditions, not the most ideal conditions. TheUnder ideal conditionsconditions, we can release enough energy to boilblow athe roof off
[88:38] this place — and I don't have the money to pay dirt for the reconstruction of the building
[88:43]building, and I'm sure they wouldn't ask us back.
Anti-Flashback and Safety Systems
[88:48] All rightright, now I want you to tell me again it's— ais the fuel cell hot
[88:48]or of cold.cold? Still a cold process. Now I want you to put your finger on there and tell me if that's hot.
[88:58] Now I did that.that It's— ais it hot ofor cold.cold? Just a hair warmwarm, right? WellWell, how can we support a flame
[89:06] well over 5,000 degrees and nowthen put theyour finger on it.it?
[89:06] Let me ask you a question. How can you be able
[89:13] to support a flame well over 5,000 degrees and yet this thing does not become super hot? The reason
[89:18] being is that we developed a patented printingprinted circuit which allows the facility to prevent
[89:23] anti spark backanti-flashback into the generator. This now makes the generator a stealthvery to stay in here asafe, very
[89:28] stealth stealth-style generatorgenerator, because in a mercurymechanical slidesystem, whatever can go wrong will go wrong. It's
[89:34] electronically interfaced.interfaced We— we can shut off the system if any form of malfunction will occur.occurs.
[89:46] You're going to shut it off over now that flame?now? Yeah. All rightright, put your hand again and tell me
[89:51]— that'sis that hot ofor cold.
[89:52] I'd be quick one.cold? Just bellybarely warm. OkayOkay, now if youyou'd go sit downdown, we'll go on with the presentation.