Deer Creek - Conference Center - Sterling, OH - Transcription - Part 4

Deer Creek Conference 1985 - Part 4

Stanley A. Meyer - Sterling, OH 1985 · Part 4 of 5 · Minutes 90-120

---

[90:01] I don't? Yes. Until until the water go out of the fuel cell or reduce down with the water

[90:10] with the fuel below the exciter element. In other words you keep the port in until you

[90:17] consumed all the water all the process. That's being a stealth real poor material. Now as I questioned

[90:28] this man earlier in the presentation about the water he said he used natural water right?

[90:33] No chemical adders did not process it anyway. Now if any inventor says to you that they've come up

[90:39] with a design concept or an invention that has all pluses and no negatives get up and walk out

[90:46] I'd be doing the same thing. There is a negative aspect to the fuel cell

[90:51] but it is a blessing in disguise. Now as the man testified that he was using ordinary natural

[90:57] water and you notice the colorization in the water here. Now since we're spilling the water molecule

[91:02] by the influence of voltage any form of contaminants in the water remains as contaminants and as a

[91:09] result of that contaminants remain in the fuel cell the liberated hydrogen oxygen gas is now

[91:14] being combined with the ambient air that's in the water and adjusting the burn rate down

[91:19] where it's supporting a high temperature flame. So you remember back at the time of the Arab and

[91:24] Bargo that people were going to the hospital like Riverside Hospital or one of the hospitals in

[91:29] Columbus and they were going to the hospital to get well but they were drinking water and

[91:34] dying of Legionnaires disease. Anyone ever know about that? You hear about that? What took place?

[91:39] But they didn't have the energy they dropped it down to a certain temperature and as a result that

[91:43] Legionnaires disease the germs bested and that's what took place. So inherently just as

[91:51] Christmas as even the desert areas were blossoming if there's any contaminants in the water remains

[91:57] in the fuel cell if there's any bacteria that is in the water that attaches itself to the gasses

[92:04] there is no bacteria on the face of this earth that I know of that can live to an exposure of

[92:10] 5,000 degree flames. Now if you don't believe me go ask the R laboratory of how they get rid of and

[92:18] kill all of this germ warfare they expose the germs to a high temperature flame. So by simply now

[92:25] recapturing the gasses pulling them down and recapturing bring them back you now have a most

[92:32] fantastic water purification system free of all contaminants and bacteria. Now the most phenomenal

[92:41] event about this is you see any filters to the system? You see any chemicals to the system?

[92:48] If you look at the prior state of the art dictates you got to process the water you got to run it

[92:52] through activated charcoal granules that have a certain life expectancy to it or other types of

[92:58] chemical filters and you got to process the water in any way shape or fashion. The fuel cell does not

[93:03] have to go through that expenditure in order to come up with a water source free of all bacteria

[93:11] or free of bacteria and contaminants so inherently the water fuel cell is a fantastic water purification

[93:17] system. Now so years ago we demonstrated on channel 6 and 1 in a 16 horsepower tractor engine

[93:26] off of water and it was obvious that when we were doing this at that time we could hook a

[93:35] gearbox to that 16 horsepower tractor engine and now attach an electrical generator to it

[93:41] and produce electrical energy by using the fuel cell. Now this is all right except one thing it

[93:47] does not comply to the laws of economics the guy who conducts the most cheapest way is going to

[93:52] win out. If you would drive your car for an example 100,000 miles at 55 miles per hour you'll be in

[93:58] that car roughly 2,000 hours. Now if you have a car that lasts without any maintenance costs for over

[94:07] that period of 2,000 hours let me know because somewhere along the line you're going to repair

[94:12] or replace or service that engine so it makes the state of the art nonfeasible non practical to use

[94:20] to produce electrical energy. As a result of this we had to come up with a very high reliable power

[94:26] electrical power system due to the fact that the fuel cell utilizes voltage. Now a voltage device is

[94:34] relatively very small as compared to an amp device. You know what an amp generator looks like to

[94:40] produce 2,000 amps? Pretty big isn't it? A voltage device is relatively very small. Now in order to

[94:49] do this the Lord had me to develop a whole series of very economical very economic and very efficient

[94:58] electrical generators. Now to understand what we're going to show you I have to now go back to what's

[95:05] called the prior state of the art. Now as I pointed out to you that we demonstrated this under the

[95:10] most adverse conditions we did not demonstrate this under the ideal conditions. This is what's

[95:16] just referred to as a standard rotary electrical generator and under Murphy's and Faraday's law

[95:23] of electronic or inductance states and clearly in fact that you must move a magnetic field through

[95:28] a coil wire to produce electrical energy. Who's ever heard of that? Is that not the base law of

[95:34] electrical generation? It is. You must pass a magnetic field through a coil wire to generate

[95:40] electrical energy. Under the prior state of the art you have an armature here as you see right here

[95:48] and you must excite the armature with energy if you're going to use a coil or you use a permanent

[95:54] magnet and you have what's called a stator ring. Now the purpose of the stator ring was to elevate

[95:59] the magnetic field off of the armature and pass it through this pickup coil and create this and

[96:05] complete this electromagnetic circuit and then by oscillating this electromagnetic circuit you now

[96:12] are producing the electrical energy. Now under the prior state of the art as in fact you cannot

[96:17] produce more energy on the output side than you put on the input side. As an example of what we

[96:23] have shown you with a standard rotary electrical generator if you were to put 10 volts of 10 amps

[96:29] across a field of the alternator you would add in 120 watts of power but you also have to add

[96:35] in another form of energy to this generator. Now our rotary electrical generator has the same problem

[96:41] in the fact is one is electrical energy to create the field. Now that energy to create the field

[96:49] is only 120 watts of power. Now it's known in physics that that field does not degenerate

[96:57] when that field is turning through the coil and what proves that out I could take a permanent

[97:01] magnet and rotate it in the coil of wire for an extremely long periods of time and as long as the

[97:05] magnetic field is there that permanent magnet is there producing electrical energy right.

[97:10] Now if you don't believe me go down to cosine then you can go over and look at Thomas Adderson's

[97:14] generator that has the magnetic field that's rotating allowing the conductor to rotate through

[97:19] the magnetic field and they're still there today and it still works. So the field is not degenerated

[97:25] by a permanent magnet. Now the point being is I'm trying to bring out here the energy into this

[97:32] generator is to produce the magnetic field of 120 watts of power. Question what is actually producing

[97:38] the electrical energy? It's the field passing the coil of wires not. It's the 120 watts of energy

[97:46] that's going in to this generator that's actually producing the energy but inherently in the inherent

[97:54] design of a rotor electrical generator you got a design problem. Design problem is you've got to

[98:01] satisfy Maxwell's Fairleigh's wall of inductance by passing a magnetic field through a coil of wire

[98:06] so as a result you must now rotate this armature. Now when you energize that armature you produce

[98:13] an electrical magnetic field do you not? And as you produce this field to complete this circuit

[98:19] the field now goes into the stator ring comes around the coil and comes back through to complete

[98:24] the circuit. You got an air gap there and when that air gap is there right there creates an opposing

[98:32] magnetic field. It creates a north and south magnetic field here. Have you ever taken two magnets

[98:41] to put them together? Does it take energy to pull apart? There's a lot of energy right? So when this

[98:47] circuit is energized here to rotate this armature takes a tremendous amount of energy. The

[98:53] stronger that magnetic field becomes the greater the mechanical torque power is required in order

[99:00] to rotate that armature. Now on a maximum duty loading would take a seven horsepower motor

[99:06] so now the total amount of energy input in to an all-enator is equivalent to 700 to convert

[99:13] mechanical energy and electrical energy. You would now multiply seven horsepower times 746 watts of

[99:20] electrical energy so the total amount of energy input into a standard rotary electrical generator

[99:24] as we show here is 5222 watts of energy. Now the 5222 watts of energy is being expended by

[99:36] rotating the magnetic field right? The 120 watts of energy is only needed to pass the magnetic field

[99:43] through the coil of water to produce electrical energy. So inherently the total amount of energy

[99:48] input into this rotary electrical generator is 120 watts plus 5222 watts or a total of 5342

[99:57] watts of energy is now going into this generator at maximum duty loading. Now you expended all this

[100:04] energy but what are you getting on the output side? 12 volts at 60 amps or 160 watts of power.

[100:13] Now efficiency is defined as energy input versus energy output is it not? So if I would now divide

[100:19] 760 watts into 5222 watts of energy then it would be what a minus 17 times 11 times something like

[100:29] that someone got a calculator? I'm not a good mathematician so someone's got a calculator

[100:35] please calculate that. That's why they say under prior state arts cannot produce more

[100:39] energy in output side than you can put on the input side because inherently of the design

[100:44] problem is called an imposing magnetic field problem. Now if in fact I could solve this

[100:51] opposing magnetic field problem right here I could in fact come up with a world's very efficient

[100:56] electrical generator could have not if I can solve that one little design problem. Well how do you

[101:04] do it? The simplest idea is the most profoundest idea it's not the complicated ones. Now when I tell

[101:09] that the Lord has given me a design of a revolutionary new electrical generator I tell him look here's

[101:14] the following characteristic it has one moving part doesn't wear out it has no bearings it has no

[101:19] contact brushes I can give you a single or three phase or any multi-phase power output that you so

[101:23] desire. Now if that doesn't bother you I can drop in a bucket of water and never short out.

[101:29] Well if you're looking for what I'm looking at you can get some smirks and the guys

[101:32] sit around the chair but after I spoke to them they stopped laughing. They're no longer laughing I

[101:38] challenge all technical people in these presentations prove me wrong. How do we solve the problem? Number

[101:46] one the Lord told me to take a non-magnetic closed loop tube take a non-magnetic material

[101:52] tubular material and make a closed loop out of it. Now what constitutes a non-magnetic tube?

[101:59] Copper, aluminum, brass certain types of non-magnetic stainless steel how about plastics?

[102:07] Any form of material that's when it's subjected to the magnetic field will not become permanently

[102:12] magnetized. Now the reason for that is is that we we don't want opposition to the movement of the

[102:17] field. All of them are sufficient electrical generator the world's oversteem because you see

[102:24] because you see if I would take the parts that you aren't put it in your home

[102:29] then within 80 to 90 days you would have to either replace or perform service on that

[102:34] that a rotary electrical generator and at a cost of around 450 dollars every 90 days so the all the

[102:41] laws of economics mix up non-peaceful. I want a generator that doesn't make any noise you can put

[102:46] it in the home produce you 220 200 amps 223 amp drawl you don't even know it's there you forgot

[102:51] about it and it's generated electric energy it has very low maintenance cost it applies to the

[102:56] law of economics. So Lord first had me come up with a non-magnetic tubular structure now I must

[103:02] comply to the law of economics a passionate magnetic field through a coil of wire so I now put a

[103:08] pickup coil on one end of this non-magnetic tube. Now the Lord had me go ahead and fill this tube up

[103:17] with a permanently magnetized material a material that's when it's exposed to a magnetic field will

[103:24] become permanently magnetized and when that becomes magnetized it will now produce and emanate a

[103:30] magnetic field like you see around this non-magnetic tube. Now if you and electronics know that if you

[103:37] magnetize a bar the magnetic fields will go from north to south would it not? What happens if you

[103:42] take the bar and you turn it around and you close it up like a loop and it has no ends to it? When

[103:48] you magnify the bar or magnify this ring which way does the magnetic field emanate? Around the ring

[103:55] does it not? What proves that in electronics? It's called a torodeo core. Anyone ever see a torodeo core

[104:01] or a pulsing core or a pulsing transformer? The same thing occurs except the difference between

[104:07] the torodeo core and this analysis is that a torodeo core has a material that will not

[104:13] maintain the magnetic field. It is not a permanently magnetized material it only allows the magnetic

[104:18] flux lines to go through it. The requirement of the EPG electrical generator is that the material

[104:23] once it's exposed will become permanently magnetized. Now once the closed-loop system becomes permanently

[104:28] magnetized like that magnetic ring or the torodeo core is there any more energy going in to maintain

[104:35] that magnetic field? No, keep that in mind. Now to satisfy Maxwell and Faraday's Lawless

[104:43] and the inductance if I can move that field through a coil of wire would I not generate

[104:48] electrical energy? Absolutely. So if I put now a gas accelerator or a particle accelerator in this

[104:55] closed-loop system and move this particle, move these magnetized particles through here

[105:01] and allow the magnetic field to cut the coil of wire I would generate electrical energy.

[105:07] Now where's the bearing? And where's contact brushing? Could I in fact encase this with a

[105:14] watertight jacket or a housing and drop it in water would it short out? Now as I pointed out

[105:20] earlier not only do we file the patents on its technology but we also file the patents on its

[105:26] related technology. Now there's a lot of different ways to move the permanently magnetized gas. One

[105:32] of the ways is the fact that we move it with a non-magnetic turbine wheel. Now mind you under this

[105:39] rotary electrical generator it took took 5,200 watts of energy to generate this maximum

[105:44] duty loading. How much power mechanical torque energy do I need in order to move this magnetic

[105:51] field this permanently magnetic particles through this closed-loop system? I need a relatively very

[105:57] small drive system would I not? Because we're not dealing now in horsepower we're dealing in torque

[106:05] ounces. Now those who don't understand what torque ounces are that's the amount of pressure that it's

[106:10] applied for a rotational force. So torque force. So how much energy do I need to apply to this

[106:18] non-magnetic turbine wheel to move this permanently magnetized gas through this closed-loop system?

[106:23] Very little as opposed to the fire state of the art. Now I can now turn this permanently magnetic wheel

[106:31] by many different methods. One is I can hook either an A or D C electric motor to that turbine right?

[106:37] But since I'm dealing in torque ounces how big is the electric motor? Relatively very small.

[106:43] You ever see these little cars going around at these tracks and kids play with you know?

[106:49] There's a little motor in it right? Could I now use one of those little motors to turn this non-magnetic

[106:54] turbine wheel? Now if I don't have an A C D C motor with me could I turn that non-magnetic wheel by

[107:00] hydraulics? How about steam power? Now if I don't have A C or D C conventional power could I use

[107:07] solar energy? I'm not talking about these solar banks that cost $144,000 per bank. I'm talking about

[107:13] two or three little solar cells to operate that electric motor. Now if I don't have electrical

[107:18] energy or solar energy or hydraulics or steam with me is there any other way I can operate it?

[107:24] Could I operate it by an internal combustion engine? Hop out of a little bit of an airplane

[107:29] engine like a .049. Right? Now if you don't have that I get Jerry back here and I can use band power.

[107:38] Show me any forearm of a generator, electrical generator that has that type of interfacing

[107:43] characteristics. Now here's NASA building these gigantic windmills three hundred and twenty feet

[107:51] high with these fantastic blades on it. Now why do they have to design these gigantic blades for?

[107:56] Because they got to overcome the opposing magnetic field problem that's associated with

[108:01] rotary electrical generators. Could I not hook a windmill to this? Then how big would the windmill

[108:07] be? Because you want like that? By the way could I not put the windmill in front of your car and

[108:13] as you go down the road develop the voltage to produce the hydrogen and run the car? Because I

[108:18] don't have to consume five thousand two and twenty watts of power on it to consume a very little

[108:22] bit of power to move the magnetized gas. Now through the eyes of a businessman that's the weak

[108:30] winky to the system. And the fact that that has moving parts right? So eventually that we're out

[108:35] so I want to go another way. I want to be able to propel the gas or the permanently magnetized

[108:41] material by other means. Now before I go on I want to point out something here. If I'm turning

[108:46] this turbine at a constant rate and the permanently magnetized material rotates from here all the

[108:52] way around and I come in one second and then I let the velocity of the gas to be constant.

[108:59] Question could I increase power output without increasing the power input stage?

[109:05] And the answer is yes because I now can take this coil and wrap another coil around the tube and

[109:11] another coil around the tube and I'm now going from a single to a three phase valence phase system.

[109:18] Now the power company drops the windmill and stops in one of the three legs. It feeds

[109:24] any current back into the three phase motors and as a result burns up a lot of these three

[109:28] phase motors to the farmer. And if you ever bought a three phase electric motor man you got a deep

[109:33] deep in your pocket to get the money right? The utility company has asked me so years ago when I

[109:38] gave a testimony on WCBO how in the world can you come up with plus and minus in regulations to

[109:44] regulate it within one percent? Well at the velocity of the gas here is the same as here

[109:49] as the same as here isn't it? So therefore I have total complete valence phasing and I'm not using

[109:54] any formal electronic circuit design to accomplish a task. Now power output of a generator is determined

[110:01] in a following way. Fire state of the art number one is

[110:08] the strength of the magnetic field that we talked about. The velocity by which the field

[110:12] moves through the coil. The number of turns per coil and the number of coils this happens to have

[110:19] in a power output three coils 33 loose. It's inherently restricted to that power output design

[110:26] because of the air gap problem and the power generator equated we can increase power output

[110:33] by simply increasing and putting more coils around this pickup tube to increase power output

[110:40] of the system. This is a model that's required on the patent office to develop this is electrical

[110:46] particle generator. This is your non-magnetic turbine wheel. This is your electric motor. These

[110:51] coils right here are what is called orientation coils and it deals with the alignment of the

[110:57] dinaxes of the gas for a plus with the off-presenter later. This is your copper tubing that comes out

[111:04] and it's wrapped around this pickup as you see right here these pickup coils and since this

[111:10] closed loop system once you fill this up with a primary magnetized gas the magnetic field is

[111:14] emanated around that tube. Now when you turn this electric motor you're now moving the gas

[111:20] to such an extent that it's now crossing the coils pickup coils and it's now producing electrical

[111:26] energy. Now these pickup coils could be hooked in serious parallel arrangement to come up with any

[111:32] power or voltage or amp power that you need. Now we came to come to the fact can we not move the

[111:43] primary magnetized gas without any mechanical displacement part. You're now going to witness

[111:48] the first time the development of an electronic electrical generator. Now over here I have what's

[111:53] called an electrical the electromagnetic pump system. It operates very similar to a linear motor.

[112:02] Anyone ever know what a linear motor is? The definition of a linear motor is try to take a

[112:07] magnetic field to prepare something. And the technology was the requirement of how in the

[112:13] world could you propel a primary magnetized material in a closed loop system you could do it on a

[112:17] prior city art. So the development that if I could in fact develop a way of triggering the

[112:24] pulses in a way to move in a linear fashion is sweeping the field you now could come up with a

[112:30] ability to move that mass in a closed loop system. To give an illustration of this

[112:43] I'm now using an ordinary electromagnetic field to move mass.

[112:52] That's an example. Now like somebody come up here if you will I want you to look at that

[112:58] and I want you to tell me if there's any gears or teeth or anything like that in there.

[113:07] Now pictures work a thousand words it's the same system here. This is the electromagnetic pump

[113:11] system. This is a non-magnetic tube. This is your pickup coil and as a result when you sweep the

[113:18] field in a linear motion it acts as a pump. It actually sucks in the gas here and repels it out

[113:24] of here. The gas is now being moved around this closed loop system and the magnetic field as we

[113:28] talked about the permanent magnetic field is now circulating and it's now producing electrical

[113:32] energy. Now let me ask you a question. Where's the bearing? Where's contact brushes? We use the

[113:39] latest state of solid state circuit design and the capabilities of electronic circuits are the last

[113:45] for 20 to 30 years since we are having no mechanical moving parts what's going to wear out of the system.

[113:52] Nothing so therefore we'd have a very highly reliable system. Now this was an alternate step in

[113:58] three phase or multi-phase power output. We could now subdivide the tubular structure in this fashion

[114:05] to come up with a multi-phase power output. As we've shown this is a picture and that's the

[114:10] apparatus of the EPG Electro generator. Now keeping everything constant

[114:16] could we increase power output still further by increasing the velocity of the gas?

[114:26] And the answer is yes because now we can coat the inside of this non-magnetic tube with a

[114:31] reflective surface. Anyone ever see copper coated with nickel chrome?

[114:37] Now anyone ever know about what's called a light guy or fiber optics?

[114:46] The for telephones that transmit light energy? I now can inject into the process

[114:54] photon energy which interacts with the electromagnetic field at the speed of light

[114:58] and therefore use it as a pumping action and produce tremendous amounts of electrical energy.

[115:04] Now example what would happen if I would take a non-magnetic tube

[115:08] and take it all the way down the Gulf of Mexico bring it back here to Deer Creek.

[115:12] I put a thousand turns for coil and hook these coils in parallel series arrangement all the way

[115:17] down the Gulf of Mexico bring it back fill that dude up with a magnetized gas and I use a laser

[115:25] energy to excite the gas into a propellant. How much electrical energy do you think I can generate?

[115:34] I could generate all the electrical energy going all the way down to the Gulf of Mexico

[115:39] and I'm doing it all non-magnetically or non-mechanically.

[115:45] Now we develop also the ability of what's called a pulse voltage sprinkler generator.

[115:51] I don't want to move the gas and the prior state we're using or moving the gas but I want to move

[115:56] the gas. Therefore if you remember under dinaxis of a magnet we now can come up with the designers

[116:06] or scientists says if we could oscillate a permanently magnetic field we could come up with

[116:10] an ultra-efficient electrical generator right. Energy input is only to oscillate the magnetic field

[116:17] not to create the field so energy is not being consumed to create the field. So what had me

[116:22] develop what's called a pulse voltage frequency generator. Now if this is a closed-loop system as

[116:27] I pointed out when it's permanently magnetized the magnetic field emanates around that ring does

[116:32] it not. Now what happens if I would now take a part of this ring as a key and take it out of the ring.

[116:40] What happened to the field? It would collapse and it would form into a horseshoe magnet would it not?

[116:47] Everyone see a horseshoe magnet? A horseshoe magnet has carried rips and it's got open in.

[116:52] I don't know how physics anything a difference of potential we know that a magnetic field will

[116:57] travel very easily in this type of a system or in the metal and travels very it's very hard to

[117:04] travel in there. As a result of that the horseshoe magnet comes in. Now if I would insert the metal

[117:10] ring back into here and close it up again what would happen to the magnetic field. It would now

[117:15] reconstitute itself around the ring. So if I would have now a pickup coil around this ring and if I'd

[117:22] move this mechanical key in and out would I not oscillate the permanent magnetic field?

[117:27] And as a result I would generate electrical energy would it not? Now moving that magnetic key would

[117:32] wear out. You'd have a design problem it wouldn't it wouldn't last very long but I'm looking at

[117:38] longevity because you see different designs in EPG system were designed to operate under different

[117:43] climatical conditions under different requirements throughout the world. That's right my prayer to

[117:48] the Lord was Lord you help me put a park's plan of country and I'll do anything you want me to do

[117:52] so we had to solve a lot of facets of problems in order to do this. So therefore we put two

[117:57] pulsing coils on either end of this open gap and when I energize these two coils it produces an

[118:04] electromagnetic field here an electromagnetic field what are they? When I create this magnetic field

[118:10] this magnetic field will now overcome the opposition of difference of potential of this

[118:15] air cap and cause these magnetic particles to swing in its axis form and now when I pulse

[118:21] these coils this magnetic field is oscillating back and forth and I'm now generating electrical

[118:26] energy. Now in the prior study art on high pulse voltage frequency it was absolutely in

[118:33] a characteristic that the higher the higher you pulse it the lower power you you can generate

[118:38] from it but the electrical pulse voltage frequency generator now gives us the ability to pulse at a

[118:44] very high pulse rate frequency and deliver a high power yield. Now Charlie has here this is the

[118:51] forerunner the pulse voltage frequency generator this is your air gap this is your non-magnetic tube

[118:56] filled with a magnetized gas. Now these coils are now pulsed in a sequential fashion they're

[119:03] pulsed together or dual-fashioned sequentially and each coil here now overcomes the pulsing

[119:08] limitation of one coil adds another coil and as a result the more coils you have here you can

[119:14] increase the pulse frequency at a tremendous rate because the flipping of the dinaxes of the

[119:19] permanent magnetized material is at a phenomenal rate so as a result we have a very efficient

[119:24] pulse voltage frequency generator as you see right here. Now are there other ways to

[119:35] accomplish a task? We pointed out the air gap problem is a phenomenal problem with a rotary

[119:40] electrical generator right because that field has got to go across the air gap and creates that

[119:45] magnetic field that opposes the rotation of the armature. Can we now absolutely take and rotate

[119:52] or spin a magnetic field without any mechanical displacement part? Can we do that? The simplest

[119:58] idea and most profoundest idea is not the complicated one you're now seeing an answer to a phenomenal