Deer Creek - Conference Center - Sterling, OH - Transcription - Part 4
Deer Creek Conference 1985 - Part 4 (90-120 min)
Stanley A. Meyer - Sterling, OH 1985 · Part 4 of 5 · Minutes 90-120
Water Contaminants and the Fuel Cell as Water Purifier
[90:01] I don't? Yes. Until until the water gogoes out of the fuel cell or reducereduces down with the water
[90:10] with the fuel below the exciter element.element In— in other wordswords, you keep the portprocess ingoing until you
[90:17]you've consumed all the water all the process. That's being a stealth real poor material.water. Now as I questioned
[90:28] this man earlier in the presentation about the waterwater, he said he used natural waterwater, right?
[90:33] No chemical addersadditives, did not process it anyway.in any way. Now if any inventor says to you that they've come up
[90:39] with a design concept or an invention that has all pluses and no negativesnegatives, get up and walk out
[90:46]— I'd be doing the same thing. There is a negative aspect to the fuel cell
[90:51]cell, but it is a blessing in disguise.
[90:51] Now as the man testified that he was using ordinary natural
[90:57] waterwater, and you notice the colorization in the water here. Now sinceSince we're spillingsplitting the water molecule
[91:02] by the influence of voltage, any form of contaminants in the water remains as contaminantscontaminants. and asAs a
[91:09] result of thatresult, contaminants remain in the fuel cellcell. theThe liberated hydrogen -oxygen gas is now
[91:14] being combined with the ambient air that's in the water andwater, adjusting the burn rate down
[91:19]to where it's supporting a high temperature flame.
[91:19] So you remember back at the time of the Arab and
[91:24] Bargo thatembargo, people were going to the hospital — like Riverside Hospital or one of the hospitals in
[91:29] Columbus — and they were going to the hospital to get well but they were drinking water and
[91:34] dying of LegionnairesLegionnaires' disease. Anyone ever know about that? You hear about that? What took place?
[91:39] But theyThey didn't have the energyenergy; they dropped it down to a certain temperature and as a result that
[91:43] LegionnairesLegionnaires' disease the germs bestedpersisted, and that's what took place. So inherently just as
[91:51] ChristmasSo as even the desert areas were blossominginherently, if there's any contaminants in the waterwater, remains
[91:57]remain in the fuel cellcell. ifIf there's any bacteria that is in the water that attaches itself to the gasses
[92:04]gases, there is no bacteria on the face of this earth that I know of that can live to anthrough exposure of
[92:10]to 5,000 degree flames. Now if you don't believe meme, go ask the Rresearch laboratory of how they get rid of and
[92:18] kill all of this germ warfare — they expose the germs to a high temperature flame. So by simply now
[92:25] recapturing the gassesgases, pulling them down and recapturingrecapturing, bringbringing them backback, you now have a most
[92:32] fantastic water purification system free of all contaminants and bacteria. Now the most phenomenal
[92:41] Now the most phenomenal event about this is— do you see any filters toin the system? YouDo you see any chemicals toin the system?
[92:48] If you look at the prior state of the artart, it dictates youyou've got to process the water you got towater, run it
[92:52] through activated charcoal granules that have a certain life expectancy to itthem, or other types of
[92:58] chemical filters and you got to process the water in any way shape or fashion.filters. The fuelWater cellFuel Cell does not
[93:03] have to go through that expenditure in order to come up with a water source free of all bacteria
[93:11] or free of bacteria and contaminantscontaminants. soSo inherentlyinherently, the waterWater fuelFuel cellCell is a fantastic water purification system.
Demonstrating Engine Power and the Laws of Economics
[93:17] system. Now sosome years ago we demonstrated on channelChannel 6 and 1Channel in10 a 16 horsepower tractor engine
[93:26]running off of waterwater. andAnd it was obvious that when we were doing this at that timetime, we could hook a
[93:35] gearbox to that 16 horsepower tractor engine and now attach an electrical generator to it
[93:41] and produce electrical energy by using the fuel cell. Now this is all right except one thing — it
[93:47] does not comply towith the laws of economicseconomics. theThe guy who conducts the most cheapest way is going to win out.
[93:52] win out. If you would drive your carcar, for an exampleexample, 100,000 miles at 55 miles per hourhour, you'll be in
[93:58] that car roughly 2,000 hours. Now if you have a car that lasts without any maintenance costs for over
[94:07] that period of 2,000 hourshours, let me know — because somewhere along the line you're going to repair
[94:12] or replacereplace, or service that engineengine. soSo it makes the state of the art nonfeasiblenon-feasible, non non-practical to use
[94:20] to produce electrical energy.
The Need for a Reliable Voltage-Based Power System
[94:20] As a result of thisthis, we had to come up with a very highhighly reliable power
[94:26] electrical power systemsystem, due to the fact that the fuel cell utilizes voltage.voltage. Now a voltage device is
[94:34] relatively very small as compared to an amp device. You know what an amp generator looks like to
[94:40] produce 2,000 amps? Pretty bigbig, isn't it? A voltage device is relatively very small. Now in order to
[94:49] do thisthis, the Lord had me to develop a whole series of very economical very economic and very efficient electrical generators.
The Prior State of the Art: Rotary Electrical Generators
[94:58] electrical generators. Now to understand what we're going to show youyou, I have to now go back to what's
[95:05] called the prior state of the art. Now asAs I pointed out to you thatout, we demonstrated this under the
[95:10] most adverse conditions — we did not demonstrate this under the ideal conditions. This is what's
[95:16] just referred to as a standard rotary electrical generatorgenerator, and under Murphy's and Faraday's law
[95:23] of electronicinductance, or inductanceit states and clearly in fact that you must move a magnetic field through
[95:28] a coil of wire to produce electrical energy. Who's ever heard of that? Is that not the base law of
[95:34] electrical generation? It is.is You— you must pass a magnetic field through a coil of wire to generate electrical energy.
[95:40]48] electrical energy. Under the prior state of the artart, you have an armature here as you see right here
[95:48]see, and you must excite the armature with energy if— you'reeither going to useusing a coil or you use a permanent
[95:54] magnet — and you have what's called a stator ring. Now the purpose of the stator ring was to elevate
[95:59] the magnetic field off of the armature and pass it through this pickup coil andto create this and
[96:05] complete this electromagnetic circuitcircuit. and thenThen by oscillating this electromagnetic circuitcircuit, you are now producing electrical energy.
The Opposing Magnetic Field Problem
[96:12]17] are producing the electrical energy. Now under the prior state of the art asart, in factfact, you cannot
[96:17] produce more energy on the output side than you put on the input side. As an example of what we
[96:23] have shown youexample, with a standard rotary electrical generatorgenerator, if you were to put 10 volts ofat 10 amps
[96:29] across athe field of the alternatoralternator, you would add in 120 watts of powerpower. butBut you also have to add
[96:35] in another form of energy to this generator. Now our rotary electrical generator has the same problem
[96:41] in the fact is— one is electrical energy to create the field. Now that energy to create the field
[96:49] is only 120 watts of power.
[96:57] Now it's known in physics that thatthe field does not degenerate
[96:57] when that field isit's turning through the coilcoil. and whatWhat proves that out — I could take a permanent
[97:01] magnet and rotate it in thea coil of wire for an extremely long periods of timetime, and as long as the
[97:05] magnetic field is therethere, that permanent magnet is there producing electrical energy right.
[97:10]energy. Now if you don't believe meme, go down to cosinethe thenSmithsonian — you can go over and look at Thomas Adderson'Edison's
[97:14] generator that has the magnetic field that's rotatingrotating, allowing the conductor to rotate through
[97:19] the magnetic fieldfield, and they'reit's still there today and it still works. So the field is not degenerated by a permanent magnet.
[97:25] by a permanent magnet. Now the point being is I'm trying to bring out here — the energy into this
[97:32] generator is to produce the magnetic field of 120 watts of power. QuestionQuestion: what is actually producing
[97:38] the electrical energy? It's the field passing the coil of wires not.wires. It's not the 120 watts of energy
[97:46] that's going in tointo this generator that's actually producing the energyenergy. butBut inherentlyinherently, in the inherent
[97:54] design of a rotorrotary electrical generatorgenerator, youyou've got a design problem.
[98:01] The design problem is you've got to
[98:01] satisfy Maxwell's Fairleigh'and Faraday's walllaw of inductance by passing a magnetic field through a coil of wire
[98:06] soSo as a resultresult, you must now rotate this armature. Now whenWhen you energize that armaturearmature, you produce
[98:13] an electricalelectromagnetic magnetic fieldfield, do you not? And as you produce this field to complete this circuit
[98:19]circuit, the field now goes into the stator ringring, comes around the coilcoil, and comes back through to complete
[98:24] the circuit. YouYou've got an air gap therethere, and when that air gap is there right there creates an opposing
[98:32] magnetic field. It creates a north and south magnetic field here.
[98:41] Have you ever taken two magnets
[98:41]and tried to put them together? Does it take energy to pull them apart? There's a lot of energyenergy, right? So when this
[98:47] circuit is energized hereenergized, to rotate this armature takes a tremendous amount of energy. The
[98:53] stronger that magnetic field becomesbecomes, the greater the mechanical torque power is required in order
[99:00] to rotate that armature. Now on aat maximum duty loadingloading, it would take a seven horsepower motormotor.
Efficiency Analysis: Input vs. Output
[99:06] so nowSo the total amount of energy input in tointo an all-enatoralternator is equivalent to 700— to convert
[99:13] mechanical energy andto electrical energy.energy You— you would now multiply seven horsepower times 746 watts of
[99:20] electrical energyenergy. so theThe total amount of energy input into a standard rotary electrical generator
[99:24] as we show here is 52225,222 watts of energy.watts. Now thethat 52225,222 watts of energy is being expended by
[99:36] rotating the magnetic field right?field. The 120 watts of energy is only needed to pass the magnetic field
[99:43] through the coil of waterwire to produce electrical energy. So inherently the total amount of energy
[99:48] So inherently, the total energy input into this rotary electrical generator is 120 watts plus 52225,222 wattswatts, or a total of 5342
[99:57]5,342 watts of energy is now going into this generator at maximum duty loading. Now youyou've expended all this
[100:04] energyenergy, but what are you getting on the output side? 12 volts at 60 ampsamps, or 160720 watts of power.
[100:13] Now efficiency is defined as energy input versus energy outputoutput, is it not? So if I woulddivide now divide
[100:19] 760720 watts into 52225,222 watts of energy then it would be what a minus 17 times 11 times something like
[100:29] that— someone got a calculator? I'm not a good mathematician so someone's got a calculator
[100:35] please calculate that.mathematician. That's why they say under the prior state artsof the art you cannot produce more
[100:39] energy inon the output side than you can put on the input sideside, because inherently of the inherent design problem called the opposing magnetic field problem.
[100:44] problem is called an imposing magnetic field problem. Now if in fact I could solve this
[100:51] opposing magnetic field problem right hereproblem, I could in fact come up with athe world's verymost efficient
[100:56] electrical generator could have not— if I can solve that one little design problem. Well how do you
[101:04] do it? The simplest idea is the most profoundestprofound idea — it's not the complicated ones.
The Revolutionary Electrical Particle Generator (EPG)
[101:09] Now when I tell
[101:09]people that the Lord has given me athe design of a revolutionary new electrical generatorgenerator, I tell himthem: lookhere here's
[101:14]are the following characteristiccharacteristics — it has one moving partpart, doesn't wear out itout, has no bearings itbearings, has no
[101:19] contact brushesbrushes, and I can give you a single or three three-phase or any multi-phase power output that you so
[101:23] desire. Now if that doesn't bother youyou, I can drop it in a bucket of water and it'll never short out.
[101:29] Well if you're looking for what I'm looking atWell, you can get some smirks and the guys
[101:32] sit around the chairtable, but after I spokeexplain it to themthem, they stoppedstop laughing. They're no longer laughinglaughing. I
[101:38] challenge all technical people in these presentations — prove me wrong.
[101:46] How do we solve the problem? Number
[101:46] oneone, the Lord told me to take a non-magnetic closed closed-loop tube — take a non-magnetic material
[101:52] tubular material and make a closed loop out of it. Now what constitutes a non-magnetic tube?
[101:59] Copper, aluminum, brassbrass, certain types of non-magnetic stainless steel — how about plastics?
[102:07] Any form of material that'sthat, when it's subjected to thea magnetic fieldfield, will not become permanently
[102:12] magnetized. Now theThe reason for that is is that we we don't want opposition to the movement of the
[102:17] field. All of them are sufficient electrical generator the world's oversteem because you see
[102:24] becauseAll rotary electrical generators the world has ever seen — if you see if I would taketook the parts that you aren'tand put it in your home
[102:29]home, then within 80 to 90 days you would have to either replace or perform service on that
[102:34] that a rotary electrical generator andgenerator, at a cost of around $450 dollars every 90 daysdays. soSo it doesn't comply with the all the
[102:41] laws of economics mix up non-peaceful.economics. I want a generator that doesn't make any noisenoise. youYou can put
[102:46] it in the homehome, produce you220 220volts at 200 ampsamps, a 223 amp drawldraw — you don't even know it's therethere, you forgot
[102:51] about itit, and it's generatedgenerating electricelectrical energy it haswith very low maintenance costcost. itIt appliescomplies towith the laws of economics.
Permanently Magnetized Gas in a Closed-Loop System
[102:56]103:02] lawSo of economics. Sothe Lord first had me come up with a non-magnetic tubular structurestructure. nowNow I must
[103:02] comply towith the law of economicsinductance — pass a passionate magnetic field through a coil of wire — so I now put a
[103:08] pickup coil on one end of this non-magnetic tube. Now the Lord had me go ahead and fill this tube up
[103:17] with a permanently magnetized material — a material that'sthat when it's exposed to a magnetic field will
[103:24] become permanently magnetizedmagnetized. and whenWhen that becomes magnetizedmagnetized, it will now produce and emanate a
[103:30] magnetic field like you see around this non-magnetic tube. Now if you and electronics know that if you
[103:37] Now in electronics, if you magnetize a barbar, the magnetic fields will go from north to southsouth, would it not? What happens if you
[103:42] take the bar and you turn it around and you close it up like a looploop, and it has no ends to it? When
[103:48] you magnifymagnetize the bar — or magnifymagnetize this ring — which way does the magnetic field emanate? Around the ring
[103:55]ring, does it not? What proves that in electronics? It's called a torodeotoroidal core. Anyone ever see a torodeotoroidal corecore, or a pulsing core, or a pulsing transformer?
[104:01] or a pulsing core or a pulsing transformer? The same thing occursoccurs, except the difference between
[104:07] the torodeotoroidal core and this analysisdesign is that a torodeotoroidal core has a material that will not
[104:13] maintain the magnetic field. It is not a permanently magnetized material — it only allows the magnetic
[104:18] flux lines to gopass through it. The requirement of the EPG electrical generator is that the material
[104:23]material, once it's exposedexposed, will become permanently magnetized. Now once the closed-loop system becomes permanently
[104:28] magnetizedmagnetized, like that magnetic ring or the torodeotoroidal core — is there any more energy going in to maintain
[104:35] that magnetic field? No,No. keepKeep that in mind.
Moving the Magnetized Gas: Mechanical Methods
[104:43] Now to satisfy Maxwell and Faraday's Lawless
[104:43]of and the inductanceinductance, if I can move that field through a coil of wirewire, would I not generate
[104:48] electrical energy? Absolutely. So if I put now a gas accelerator or a particle accelerator in this
[104:55] closed-loop system and move this particle, move these magnetized particles through here
[105:01] and allow the magnetic field to cut the coil of wirewire, I would generate electrical energy.
[105:07] Now where's the bearing? AndWhere's where'sthe contact brushing?brushes? Could I in fact encase this with a
[105:14] watertight jacket or a housing and drop it in water — would it short out?
[105:20] Now as I pointed out
[105:20] earlierearlier, not only do we file the patents on itsthis technologytechnology, but we also file the patents on its
[105:32] of the ways is the fact that we move it with a non-magnetic turbine wheel. Now mind you under this
[105:39]the rotary electrical generatorgenerator, it took took 5,200 watts of energy to generate this maximum
[105:44] duty loading. How much power mechanical torque energy do I need in order to move this magnetic
[105:51] field this permanently magneticmagnetized particlesgas through this closed-loop system? I need a relatively very
[105:57] small drive systemsystem, would I not? Becausebecause we're not dealing now in horsepower — we're dealing in torque ounces.
[106:05] ounces. NowFor those who don't understand what torque ounces are — that's the amount of pressure that it's
[106:10] applied for a rotational force. So torque force. So how much energy do I need to apply to this
[106:18] non-magnetic turbine wheel to move this permanently magnetized gas through this closed-loop system?
[106:23] Very littlelittle, as opposed to the fireprior state of the art.
Versatile Drive Methods for the EPG
[106:23] Now I can now turn this permanently magneticmagnetized wheel
[106:31]gas by many different methods. One is I can hook either an AAC or D CDC electric motor to that turbineturbine, right?
[106:37] But since I'm dealing in torque ouncesounces, how big is the electric motor? Relatively very small.
[106:43] You ever see these little cars going around at these tracks andthat kids play with you know?
[106:49]with? There's a little motor in itthem, right? Could I now use one of those little motors to turn this non-magnetic turbine wheel?
[106:54]107:00] turbine wheel? Now if I don't have an AAC Cor DDC C motor with memotor, could I turn that non-magnetic wheel by
[107:00] hydraulics? How about steam power? Now ifIf I don't have A C or D C conventional powerpower, could I use
[107:07] solar energy? I'm not talking about these solar banks that cost $144,000 per bank.bank — I'm talking about
[107:13] two or three little solar cells to operate that electric motor. Now ifIf I don't have electrical
[107:18] energy or solar energy or hydraulics or steam with mesteam, is there any other way I can operate it?
[107:24] Could I operate it by an internal combustion engine? Hop out of aA little bit of an airplane
[107:29] engine like a .049.049? Right? Now ifIf you don't have thatthat, I get Jerry back here and Iwe can use bandhand power.
[107:38] Show me any forearmother form of a generator, electrical generator that has that type of interfacing characteristics.
[107:43] characteristics. Now here's NASA building these gigantic windmillswindmills, three hundred and twenty320 feet
[107:51] high with these fantastic blades on it.them. Now whyWhy do they have to design these gigantic blades for?
[107:56]blades? Because theythey've got to overcome the opposing magnetic field problem that's associated with
[108:01] rotary electrical generators. Could I not hook a windmill to this? Then how big would the windmill
[108:07] be? Because you want like that? By the wayway, could I not put the windmill in front of your car and
[108:13] as you go down the road develop the voltage to produce the hydrogen and run the car? Because I
[108:18] don't have to consume five thousand two and twenty5,222 watts of power on— it to consumeonly a very little
[108:22] bit of power to move the magnetized gas.
Eliminating Moving Parts: The Electromagnetic Pump
[108:30] Now through the eyes of a businessmanbusinessman, that's the weak
[108:30]link winky toin the system.system And— the fact that thatit has moving partsparts, right? So eventually that we'rewould out
[108:35] soout. I want to go another way. I want to be able to propel the gas or the permanently magnetized
[108:41] material by other means. Now before I go onon, I want to point out something here.something. If I'm turning
[108:46] this turbine at a constant rate and the permanently magnetized material rotates from here all the
[108:52] way around and I come in one secondsecond, and then I let the velocity of the gas tois beconstant constant.
[108:59] Questionquestion: could I increase power output without increasing the power input stage?
[109:05] And the answer is yesyes, because I now can take this coil and wrap another coil around the tube and
[109:11] another coil around the tubetube, and I'm now going from a single to a three three-phase valence balanced-phase system.
[109:18] Now the power company drops thea windmillleg and stops in one of the three legs. It feeds
[109:24] any current back into the three three-phase motors and as a result burns up a lot of these three
[109:28] three-phase motors toon the farmer. And if you ever bought a three three-phase electric motormotor, manman, youyou've got ato deep
[109:33]dig deep in your pocket to get the moneymoney, right? The utility company has asked me so years ago when I
[109:38] The utility company asked me — years ago when I gave a testimony on WCBOWCBQ — how in the world can you come up with plus and minus inregulation, regulations to
[109:44] regulateregulating it within one percent? Well atWell, the velocity of the gas here is the same as here
[109:49] asis the same as herehere, isn't it? So therefore I have total complete valencebalanced phasingphasing, and I'm not using
[109:54] any formal electronic circuit design to accomplish athe task. Now power output of a generator is determined
[110:01] in athe following way.way Fireunder the prior state of the artart: number one is
[110:08]one, the strength of the magnetic fieldfield; that we talked about. Thethe velocity by which the field
[110:12] moves through the coil.coil; Thethe number of turns per coilcoil; and the number of coilscoils.
The happensEPG toWorking haveModel
[110:19] inThis ahappens powerto outputhave three coils with 33 loose.loops. It's inherently restricted to that power output design
[110:26] because of the air gap problemproblem. andWith the power generator equatedwe designed, we can increase power output
[110:33] by simply increasing and putting more coils around this pickup tube to increase the power output of the system.
[110:40] of the system. This is a model that'sthat was required onby the patent office to develop — this is electrical
[110:46]Electrical particleParticle generator.Generator. This is your non-magnetic turbine wheel. This is your electric motor. These
[110:51] coils right here are what is called orientation coilscoils, and itthey dealsdeal with the alignment of the
[110:57] dinaxesdiaxes of the gas for— awe'll plusdiscuss withthat the off-presenterfurther later. This is your copper tubing that comes out
[111:04] and it'sis wrapped around this pickuppickup, as you see right herehere, these pickup coilscoils. and sinceSince this
[111:10] closed closed-loop systemsystem, once you fill thisit up with a primarypermanently magnetized gasgas, the magnetic field is emanated around that tube.
[111:14] emanated around that tube. Now when you turn this electric motormotor, you're now moving the gas
[111:20] to such an extent that it's now crossing the coils pickup coils and it's now producing electrical
[111:26] energy. Now these pickup coils could be hooked in serious series-parallel arrangement to come up with any power or voltage or amperage that you need.
The Electronic Electrical Generator: No Moving Parts
[111:32] power or voltage or amp power that you need. Now we came to come to the factquestion — can we not move the
[111:43] primarypermanently magnetized gas without any mechanical displacement part.part? You're now going to witness
[111:48]for the first time the development of an electronic electrical generator. Now over here I have what's
[111:53] called an electrical the electromagnetic pump system. It operates very similar to a linear motor.
[112:02] Anyone ever know what a linear motor is? The definition of a linear motor is try to takeusing a
[112:07] magnetic field to preparepropel something. And the technology was the requirement of how in the
[112:13] The technical requirement was: how in the world could you propel a primarypermanently magnetized material in a closed closed-loop systemsystem? youYou couldcouldn't do it onwith a
[112:17]the prior citystate of the art. So the development thatwas: if I could in fact develop a way of triggering the
[112:24] pulses in a way to move in a linear fashion isfashion, sweeping the fieldfield, you now could come up with a
[112:30]the ability to move that mass in a closed closed-loop system. To give an illustration of this
[112:43] I'm now using an ordinary electromagnetic field to move mass.
[112:52] That's an example. Now likewould somebody come up here if you willhere? I want you to look at that
[112:58] and I want you to tell me if there's any gears or teeth or anything like that in there.
[113:07] Now picturesa workpicture is worth a thousand words — it's the same system here. This is the electromagnetic pump
[113:11] system. This is a non-magnetic tube. This is your pickup coilcoil. and as a result whenWhen you sweep the
[113:18] field in a linear motionmotion, it acts as a pump.pump It— it actually sucks in the gas here and repels it out
[113:24] of here. The gas is now being moved around this closed closed-loop systemsystem, and the magnetic field as we
[113:28] talked about the permanent magnetic field is now circulating and it's now producing electrical
[113:32] energy. Now let me ask you a question.question: Where'where's the bearing? Where'sWhere are the contact brushes? We use the
[113:39] We use the latest state of solid solid-state circuit designdesign, and the capabilities of electronic circuits are the last
[113:45] for 20 to 30 yearsyears. sinceSince we are havinghave no mechanical moving partsparts, what's going to wear out of the system.
[113:52]Nothing. Nothing soSo therefore we'dwe have a very highly reliable system.
Multi-Phase thisPower Output and Photon-Accelerated EPG
[113:58] This was an alternate step in
[113:58] three three-phase or multi-phase power output. We could now subdivide the tubular structure in this fashion
[114:05] to come up with a multi-phase power output. As we've shownshown, this is a picture and that's the
[114:10] apparatus of the EPG Electro— generator.the NowElectrical keepingParticle everything constantGenerator.
[114:16] Now keeping everything constant, could we increase power output still further by increasing the velocity of the gas?
[114:26] And the answer is yesyes, because now we can coat the inside of this non-magnetic tube with a
[114:31] reflective surface. Anyone ever see copper coated with nickel chrome?
[114:37] NowNow, anyone ever know about what's called a light guyguide or fiber optics?
[114:46] The— for telephones that transmit light energy?
[114:46] I can now can inject into the process
[114:54] photon energyenergy, which interacts with the electromagnetic field at the speed of light
[114:58] and therefore useuses it as a pumping action andto produce tremendous amounts of electrical energy.
[115:04] Now examplefor example, what would happen if I would take a non-magnetic tube
[115:08] and take it all the way down to the Gulf of MexicoMexico, bring it back here to Deer Creek.
[115:12]Creek? I put a thousand turns forper coil and hook these coils in parallel parallel-series arrangement all the way
[115:17] down to the Gulf of MexicoMexico, bring it backback, fill that dudeit up with a magnetized gasgas, and I use a laser
[115:25] energy to excite the gas intoas a propellant. How much electrical energy do you think I can generate?
[115:34] I could generate all the electrical energy going all the way down to the Gulf of Mexico
[115:39]Mexico, and I'm doing it all non-magnetically orand non-mechanically.
The Pulse Voltage Frequency Generator
[115:45] Now we developalso alsodeveloped the ability of what's called a pulse voltage sprinklerfrequency generator.
[115:51] I don't want to move the gas andIn the prior state of the art, we're using or moving the gasgas, but now I want to move
[115:56]it theinstead. gas. Therefore ifIf you remember underthe dinaxisdiaxes of a magnet we now can come up with the designers
[116:06] ormagnet, scientists sayshave said that if we could oscillate a permanently magnetic fieldfield, we could come up with
[116:10] an ultra-efficient electrical generator right.generator. Energy input is only to oscillate the magnetic field
[116:17]field, not to create the field — so energy is not being consumed to create the field. So what had me
[116:22] So the Lord had me develop what's called a pulse voltage frequency generator. Now if this is a closed-loop systemsystem, as
[116:27] I pointed outout, when it's permanently magnetized the magnetic field emanates around that ringring, does
[116:32] it not.not? Now what happens if I would now take a part of this ring as a key and takeremove it out offrom the ring.
[116:40]The What happened to the field? Itfield would collapsecollapse, and it would form into a horseshoe magnetmagnet, would it not?
[116:47]Everyone's Everyone seeseen a horseshoe magnet? A horseshoe magnet has carriedcurved ripstips and it's gotan open in.gap.
[116:52] IIn don't know how physics anything a difference of potentialphysics, we know that a magnetic field will
[116:57] traveltravels very easily in this type of a system or in the metalmetal, and travels very it's very hard to
[117:04] travel inthrough there.air. As a result of thatresult, the horseshoe magnet comesconfiguration in.occurs. Now if I would insert the metal
[117:10] ring back into herein and close it up againagain, what would happen to the magnetic field.field? It would now
[117:15] reconstitute itself around the ring. So if I would have now a pickup coil around this ring and if I'd
[117:22]I move this mechanical key in and outout, would I not oscillate the permanent magnetic field?
[117:27] And as a resultresult, I would generate electrical energyenergy, would itI not?
[117:32] Now moving that magnetic key would
[117:32] wear out.out You'— you'd have a design problem it wouldn'tproblem, it wouldn't last very longlong. butBut I'm looking at
[117:38] longevitylongevity, because you see different designs inof the EPG system were designed to operate under different
[117:43] climatical conditionsconditions, under different requirements throughout the world. That's right my prayer to
[117:48] the Lord was Lord you help me put a park's plan of country and I'll do anything you want me to do
[117:52] so we had to solve a lot of facets of problems in order to do this. So therefore we put two
[117:57] pulsing coils on either end of this open gapgap, and when I energize these two coils it produces an
[118:04] electromagnetic field here an electromagnetic field what are they?field. When I create this magnetic field
[118:10] this magnetic fieldit will now overcome the opposition of the difference of potential of this
[118:15] air capgap and cause these magnetic particles to swing in itstheir axis form and now when I pulseform.
[118:21] When I pulse these coilscoils, thisthe magnetic field is oscillatingoscillates back and forthforth, and I'm now generating electrical
[118:26] energy. Now inIn the prior studystate of the art on high pulse voltage frequencyfrequency, it was absolutelyan in
[118:33] aabsolute characteristic that the higher the higher you pulse itit, the lower power you you can generate
[118:38] from itit. butBut the electrical pulse voltage frequency generator now gives us the ability to pulse at a
[118:44] very high pulse rate frequency and deliver a high power yield.
[118:51] Now Charlie has here this is the
[118:51] forerunner — the pulse voltage frequency generatorgenerator. thisThis is your air gapgap, this is your non-magnetic tube
[118:56] filled with a magnetized gas. Now theseThese coils are now pulsed in a sequential fashion — they're
[119:03] pulsed together or dual-fashionedfashion sequentially — and each coil here now overcomes the pulsing
[119:08] limitation of one coil addsby adding another coilcoil. and asAs a resultresult, the more coils you have herehave, you can
[119:14] increase the pulse frequency at a tremendous raterate, because the flipping of the dinaxesdiaxes of the
[119:19] permanentpermanently magnetized material is at a phenomenal raterate. so as a resultSo we have a very efficient pulse voltage frequency generator.
Spinning a Magnetic Field Without Mechanical Parts
[119:24]35] pulse voltage frequency generator as you see right here. Now are there other ways to
[119:35] accomplish athe task? We pointed out the air gap problem is a phenomenal problem with athe rotary
[119:40] electrical generator rightgenerator, because that field has got to go across the air gap and creates that
[119:45]a magnetic field that opposes the rotation of the armature. Can we now absolutely take and rotate
[119:52] or spin a magnetic field without any mechanical displacement part? Can we do that? The simplest
[119:58] idea and most profoundestprofound idea is not the complicated one — you're now seeing an answer to a phenomenal question.