Denver 1997: the workshop, transcribed

Denver 1997

Transcribed by the archive from the tape as posted to YouTube. The film.

Introduction

[0:15] Okay, let's get started. First of all, I would like to introduce tonight, on Saturday, Stanley Meyer. Stanley Meyer is a businessman, freelance inventor, and has found and served as chairman of several high-tech businesses in the international marketplace. I think probably all the other side of the international marketplace. He has applied his scientific and engineering expertise in the medical profession, advising a heart monitor, the banking system, the validator system, oceanography, the NIVAC and the Pector system, and Star Wars, the EBED concept. All this is put together in a very nice little article that is available in the exhibition hall. He holds numerous patents, including a lot of fuel cell technology. He's listed in Who's Who for marketing inventors and entrepreneurs. He's published in several magazines. He's a well-known speaker at conferences and conferences. I'd like to introduce at this time someone who's really making it happen.

[1:17] Stand in the middle. Thank you very much. If any of you have not received any of our TSRs, kindly raise your hands. And I'd like to pass them out to you.

Communication, and the corporate structure

[1:53] We have some additional copies. Communication is the name of the game. An inventor can develop a technology and secure a patent and get it legalized inside the world to confirm it. But if you cannot communicate it, you've lost the battle. You've lost the war. And many inventors that I've talked to over the years, in many of these symposiums, there's an outcry that continuously occurs. And the outcry is, what can we do? We invent something, all of a sudden, their technology is circumvented around. And one of the loopholes, or the transparent loopholes national and international patent laws, and primarily the international patent laws. Many people are not aware of it, like if you're a U.S. inventor, if you release your technology to the public domain, you desire to file a patent. You have at least one year to file your patent, but that's also a good patent. If you know the story about Townsend on the laser, we have restored as people cite the document stating that the base potential of the laser made the announcement in the past enormous potential of the laser device.

[3:03] We're timing it around to try to file this original patent. All of the advanced technology industry put over a billion dollars behind that technology today, but of course we have the laser technology in a couple of domains. Many, many inventors come out of the basement, the garage, the backyard, and they basically say there's got to be a better way of doing something. Despite all the money and the millions of dollars that are available for research and development, they cannot pay for creativity development. I was with the child in high-tech development as a young kid. I realized quite early in the game of high tech development, that you become educated, you have a competent amount of degrees, but you cannot pay for the development of creativity. That creative thought is not controlled by the corporate structure. Many inventors do not realize that corporations are set up by the Rockefeller Foundation, that they act as an individual, but they are not an individual, and therefore corporate structures are not regulated under the constitutional laws.

[4:12] And back in the 50s and 60s,

[4:15] they were convinced that to develop a business entity, the best way to go was by corporate structure. Today, corporators come in to America. They have taken our technology, shipped it out of the country. Most of the major Fortune 500 companies are offices over in Belgium, and we're wondering what's happening to our economy. In many of our stores, it takes place that somebody's developed technology, and I will tell you, if you develop technology that has any merit whatsoever that can so-called upset the apple cart, Status quo, don't upset the apple cart. If it has any monetary value at all or cost value, I would assure you that in a relatively short period of time, you as the inventor are going to be faced with enormous problems with productivity to protect your technology. Unfortunately, there are very few organizations in the world or in the United States that an inventor can go to and ask, how can I protect my invention?

Money and the creative mind

[5:13] and then fear and paranoia comes about. Now, despite all of my experience in high-tech development, the pathing processes, and learning about the corporate world and going into high-tech development internationally, that did not prepare me for the development, really, of a one-of-a-kind technology, other than the fact that I realized that Stan Myers could not do this. I had to release my faith in the Lord to embark on a process to try to implement and bring a new technology into America and also get it into the world. Because the industrial base of the world is based on what? The utilization and supply of energy. If we have no energy, our entire economic basis will collapse. During the era of embargo, I was affiliated in the retailing of truck parts. I was making over a million dollars a year, actually 20 million across the board. And I learned the power of money. I learned to use money to destroy people.

[6:02] I learned to use money to aid and help a fellow man. I had always choose to use my creative thoughts and my creative ability not for the destruction of mankind but for the event of mankind. As a young man, when I demonstrated enormous creativity in the areas of inventing and looking at advanced technology, God had given me an enormous ability. The ability to extrapolate from high technology and bring it down to a simple form. Many times when I would go into meetings to discuss the implementation, high-tech development, whether or not we were going to spend millions of dollars to go into the development of technology, they'd always ask me, the same old song, you don't have to agree when you're talking to the PhDs. But when the PhDs would go to the board and you would ask them, and they would put their equations on the blackboard, and what they knew, the scientific world, in trying to find new ways of doing things,

[6:58] Sometimes it's not always clear in research and development as to the direction that you're going. Somehow I had the ability that after I listened to the PhDs, looked at their equations, and I would say one question, two didn't. Can you put it on the table? That's not to be called in. Their expertise is probably to research out and look and understand and deal in areas where very few men have ever dealt before. Creative thinking takes an enormous amount of energy. uh... uh... uh...

[7:40] and then correlated with other technology to come up with new ways. So I realized that somehow I had this gift that once high technology was presented to me, I could go into the room down the hall, go on my office inventory there, and all of a sudden I said, hmm, there's a way to do this. And I would put it on the table. And I was very successful at what I was doing. However, I didn't realize the employment of control of high technology in the business area And you can develop technology, and I will assure you that as advanced technology progresses, there are not a lot of people who are really interested in you to propagate or to promote your technology or get it out the door. Especially in the scientific world, they control you greatly by your tutorship at college, that you can develop certain technology. And I developed certain advanced technology, and this technology was being suppressed, and I couldn't understand why.

[8:36] logically speaking, morally, that technology should progress forward. But I realized that there were elements behind the scenes that were working that would control and suppress certain advanced technology. And so I started to look in as to the management decision as to what advanced technology would be brought forward to the economies and other ones that would be suppressed for a period of time or really not to be brought out into the public domain at all. And it all came down to the economic factor. United States today. You're going to upset the apple cart.

[9:23] you're not going to allow the status quo to continue. So the key is, how do we bring in the technology that's very critical even to our sustaining of our lives? You think we don't have a problem? When you look at the need, when you talk about the creativity and the inventive mind comes out of the need, is that not so? Right now we're in the privilege of running a turbo-combustion engine of all that's possible in the last seven years or so. We have put a lot of, an enormous amount of chemical oxides into the air as the result of burning fossil fuels. Those chemical oxides, of course, is giving the greenhouse effect. And yes, 10 years ago, as the polar caps and the atmosphere was heating up, the polar caps were going. 10 years ago, the ocean was rising 1 inch a year. Today, it's accelerated to 1.5 inch a year. All the chemical oxides go in the air and almost covalently or electrovalently linking up to the iron atmosphere.

Scandinavia and the CO2

[10:17] I went several years ago to Scandinavian countries and went to a very beautiful spot in the China. And I enjoyed the outdoors. I'm an outdoorsman. I love nature. And I enjoyed being out in the woods. Somehow I get rejuvenation and I can get my mind clear. I went back quite recently and all the trees were dying. And they said, Stan, why are the trees are dying? Well, all the chemical oxides, as a result of burning fossil fuels in the internal combustion engine, has allowed the chemical oxides to electrowave and link up to our ionosphere, and is slowly shutting off the sunlight coming into our atmosphere. In certain areas of the world, sunlight has been reduced as much as 10%. That reduction of sunlight is now causing the viral term of blight to be formed, and all the trees that we need to convert to CO2, back to O2 or oxygen, In order for us to sustain life, those trees and plant lives are dying. If you look at the growth rate of plants today on the planet, you see the growth rate has just enormously been slowed down.

[11:18] And the recreation rate of converting CO2 to O2 has dropped astronomically. But more important than that, polar samples and polarity have shown that before the industrial revolution, the O2 content in the air was around 30%. of what the privilege of running an antiair, an internal combustion engine, and running on fossil fuel, the O2 that we need to live in this environment, has dropped to around 20%. Now, its population goes from 5.6 to 9 billion in the next 10 to 15 years, and as the population will grow, the need for the internal combustion engine will continue to grow. China has opened the doors for Western technology, and it's anticipated about 1.3 to 1.5

[12:03] billion cars will be running around as planned. Now many of you got here today are buying internal combustion engines. You're not. Now when you run a car down the road, you're processing hundreds of thousands of millions of cubic feet through that internal combustion engine. We are here converting our air into a very heavy, jelly-like substance that no longer can support our life on Earth. And they talk to us that we're very intelligent, that we're very smart creatures called humans on the base of this Earth. But to me it's very illogical that we pollute the air, land, water, and sea, everything that we need to maintain our life cycle. here on Earth to be able to give love to our loved ones, to be able to grow food, and to be able to sustain ourselves, we are killing the Earth ecological life support system on Earth. It is a reality. The fear is there. The complications are there. But the world economy and the United States economy is based on the supply and utilization of energy.

[13:00] So therefore, we have a great need to unite. Therefore, the creative mind must come forward. Where is the creative mind? Is creative thought coming out of the university areas? Are they coming out of the high tech areas, the high corporation areas? No. History has shown us continuously that major technological advancements have always come from the broad advancement in the backyard. Generally, people who see a need come together and say, we have to solve the problem. So when the air of the farm were hit in the United States, and when I found out that, Stan, if you don't get your trucks on the road in 27 days, the food supply chain in the United States will be disrupted. What? You mean to tell me if you don't get any gasoline to run these trucks that, in fact, the masses in Clemson, Ohio will be facing starvation?

Independence

[13:50] A need had immediately had arisen. uh... research

[14:09] to be an independent businessman and conduct research and development on my own. Because see, no one had to tell me, I didn't have to go through a committee to decide what direction did I want to go in order to develop an idea or a technology. If I was lucky in my efforts to develop the technology, the key was not to have translated it into a product and get it out the door and make additional money to fund and finance other projects. In business though, I'm a little bit different in the fact that I was one into the business world as an independent businessman, and I was forced to learn as a young man I had developed some very advanced technology. My first efforts out in the business world, I will tell you, I had learned some extremely hard lessons by the school of hard knocks. Because when I signed the legal papers to incorporate, after I signed them, five minutes thereafter, a lawyer stood up on his feet and said, the technology belongs to us.

[15:04] You cannot touch it. And he was laughing and he was joking and he was feeling very good that he had put it over to Stan Meyer. As a young inventor around 21 years of age.

[15:14] But you see, before I signed the last paper, I stopped and paused and said to myself, am I really sure that I want to do this? And when he jumped up and made this proclamation to me, I started to say, yeah, but I did not sign the last document. It was signed under the technology to a corporate entity by the way in which I financed and paid this man to take me over by corporate structure.

[15:45] And I led him to the door, and I said, well, I guess you may be right. Two days later, he called me back, and he, in great profanity, was extremely upset, saying, you knew that you had not signed that last document. I did not sign over the technology to that corporate entity. And so I had learned when there are unscrupulous businessmen in the world, there were sort of like 28 businessmen who saw the vision of the technology that was developing in the NIDAC system, the underwater scanning system, had enormous potential for underwater scanning to be able to even the military applications. But that was a little unimaginative compared to what it feels so different. So Laura had prepared me for many, many years. I was a corporate entrepreneur, but I always decided that if I set up a corporate structure, I would always do it for the betterment of mankind. Although, I did have many offers in my lifetime to develop weapons systems, and I was asking enormous, uh, to give enormous amount of funds to me to develop these weapons systems to very efficiently kill us all.

The inventor's rights

[16:44] But I had decided as a young man, as an inventor, and as a scientist, you're going to, at one stage of your life, you're going to make a decision. And your decision is whether you're going to use your brain power for the destruction of mankind or you're going to use your brain power for the benefit of mankind. And there is no, uh, area in between. I like to go for, well, there's too many people who seem like they want to knock us off of this world, so I decided I'll try to do things that would aid the benefit of mankind, or otherwise I was not, I would not get involved in it. When I embarked on the water fuel cell technology, it became very, very important that I must be one thing. Legalize the technology first. Gentlemen, it matters. Don't go out and blow your needle. When you see a phenomenon, you see a new way of doing something, you get it legalized. Now, as I am a proprietor and not an incorporation, and therefore I operate under the greatest power that's ever been given to me, and that's the Constitution of the United States.

[17:48] It says that Stan Meyer, as an individual, has a right

[17:53] to invent technology and I have a right to reduce it down to cracks. But the law clearly stipulates that if you will do certain things, the law says you own that technology and you can decide whether that technology is going to be utilized or you can decide whether that technology will go forward to aid mankind or it can be squelched and suppressed. Now, gentlemen, there is a law, a patent law, that's under 35 U.S. Code 101 that says if there's any questions about a patent, that they're going to call you in on 101 and say demonstrate it. And if you successfully demonstrate it, they're going to give you the patent. I don't know how many times people, inventors, have expressed the fear to me, they're never going to allow me to have the patents of what's to be used. Now, believe me, if the United States government has supported the patent processing with the mere fact that if they do not, then our entire commerce and industrial base in the United States could be destroyed very, very quickly on the advancement of high technology.

[18:56] I mean, many inventors, if you've heard, like, for example, the guy who invented the little snap lock on the investment tool, Sears, There's a classic example that he saw this little invention, he went to his supervisor, they called his lawyer, said, well, the bill is not going to pay you the money, but it will pay you $10,000. Now, the guy didn't even process the patents on it. When Sears came out and made $40 million on the Plus, he decided that it was about time that he should be properly compensated. Now, the fellow didn't process the patent. The document he signed gave Sears the right to process it, from what I understand. But when he went in and decided that he wanted to settle out of court for a million dollars, the guy says no, because it would give him legal rights. In other words, they would pay him a million dollars, but they would pay $40 million off of his patent. So legally, it is stolen technology.

[19:48] Many industries in the 50s and the 60s, when I was growing up, took the position the hell with the inventor. They'll do anything we want to do. And for two decades or so, industry said, they'll do what they want to do. Well, there's been many settlements, the inventor to get compensated, probably get compensated for his invention like the barrel of a winch or a wire as a classical example. He finally, he went in and he developed the system in-house with the card industry, from my understanding, and they couldn't get it to work, so they invited him back, and he finished and designed it all on the electronic circuit, and then they kicked him out, and he wouldn't get it done. But the laws, the constitutional laws of the United States gives you a right to your invention. They don't give you a right to be compensated. But other than the economic laws, you do have a right to compensate. And of course, they sued and they did get some monetary gain out of it.

Legalise it first

[20:44] But in order to protect your invention, the first one thing you need to do is to legalize it. What in the world do I mean by legalizing it? Get your idea down on paper.

[20:57] And if you don't understand the process, go out and learn why it's doing what it's doing. Now, an inventor has a great disadvantage. Number one, you're generally a housewife, you're a factory worker, you may be an office manager, and you come up with an idea, and you say, well, how are they going to patent this and get it protected? and they're great and there are books that route

Protecting the idea

[21:52] ways of protecting yourself. First thing, get down on paper and write out the idea the best way that you can and certify that document and put it under documentation. Now, to give you an example here, in the development of technology, this is called the birth of new technology, and this is about a 216 page detailed explanation of exactly how and why I can use water as a fuel source. Now each one of these memos are patent memos. Alright? So when I started to file the patents, I did not allow the patent attorney to define the process. You write the process, and you define it, and if the patent attorney says to you, don't change it and do it this way, or allow me to give the interpretation, you say no. There are many loopholes in the patent law, both nationally and internationally. And sometimes when you come up with a money-making generator, a money-making idea, they want to change it. It's the first thing they want to do.

[22:53] They want to change your idea. They want to water down your idea, and they want to amplify their own definition of the idea. You get it down from black and white, and you submit him a memo, and you get him to sign on the dotted line that he is in receipt of that memo exactly as it's been presented to you. Make your drawings. We show the slides here. Make your drawings. Describe your drawings the best you can. If you do not understand the process, go out and learn the process. Now, it really is quite simple to go over it. If you don't understand chemistry, you go over and talk to some people in the chemistry department at Ohio State University or the university areas and say, what do you think about the process? Look it carefully and tell them the process. But there is another trap. Don't get involved with the universities. Because if you go into the patent process, automatically they own the patent. So make your join, write it up, and explain it.

[23:52] If you don't understand the part of it, take the time to go out and define it. Now, there's called a process of osmosis. They don't know what you're thinking in your mind. And they only can determine what you have in your mind and creative thinking only by asking you certain questions. And believe me, if they are not on the right track of the thinking process you're on, most chances they're not going to be able to determine what you're doing. So fear not. What you do is like I did in developing a lot of field set technology. Go out and tell people what you're doing. Game, case, history of developing a project. But don't tell them all the things of what you're doing. Now I could go out during the era of DeMarco and I may be not so good, well, I'm going to start working on a power system. Well, people who knew me knew that I stayed in the development of the project for six months. I was on the side. And after six months, I get all these weird phone calls.

[24:47] We like to cut down and talk to these people. They know you're on something, and the thing is, we like to know everything you're doing. Well, fine, when the patent is issued, I'll be more than happy to impart some of that knowledge to you. No, but like I said, once the patent is issued, then I will impart the knowledge to you. Because when you get your patent, you get the little seals on it, the little red, red and sort of blue, red and sort of seal on it, what does it say? It says that you have been blind to the laws of the land, and therefore, you are the ownership of the technology for a period of 17 years. Now, if you're wise enough to pursue developing patents, you can extend that 17 years down to 20 years or 30 years in order to get the patent technology out the door. Now, the greatest fallacy or the greatest hardship of an inventor

[25:42] and the wrongness of his thinking is that he never and hardly can pace the maturity of the technology. That's what I'm saying. 99% of the inventors do not perceive the development of technology to maturity. They see a phenomena, they see a way of doing something, they see it and they start telling the whole world and they don't discuss and they think about the ramifications of their inventions and they don't take part to continually develop it and what happens, they get a technological watch. You develop a system, and you have an apparatus, and you demonstrate it to a very knowledgeable person that you show me an idea, but my creative thinking doesn't take me very long to extrapolate as to what's being said to me, and I can create as much good idea. But morally, I would never say to the inventor, well, I'm going to take the technology and run with it. Most certainly what I do is I help the inventor, and I'm going to show you how to secure your patent development rights.

Maturity

[26:43] Hitch your patents. Now, the final path, primarily here in the symposium, is what are we concerned with? Energy, right? Now, we're always talking about the unity of energy. Is that not so? That's the key. How can we come up with an energy system capable of maintaining the economies of the world and get all the fossil fuels, reverse environmental pollution problems, and maintain the industrial base of this country and the world? Now, in order to do this, you must determine

[27:14] how you would develop that technology to maturity. Now, what is the definition of maturity? System. System engineering. Developing technology through the system engineering. What fuel cell technology is a series of many patents integrated together to use water as a new fuel source. It could not take one miracle patent to come out with an answer to the energy problem. It had to take many patents integrated together in full systems development capable of being able to solve the energy problem. You have to look at what are the ramifications of your invention, where are you trying to strive, are you just trying to give knowledge and impart wisdom to others that would have a scientific insight on developing technology, or are you motivated strictly on money, or are you motivated to help an adult man and impart some economic rewards along the way. You have to make that determination because most inventors don't have regional finances

[28:18] You're going to face enormous amount of difficulties in bringing your technology out, I'm sure of you. And you're going to have to have the moral fiber and the determination to say that I will bring it out despite all odds against you and all probability that you may not get it out the door. There are, unfortunately, some people that do have the drive to say, we have no alternative, we are at war, we need a new answer to the energy problem, and we have no choice. We're all on the planet Earth, we are destroying the Earth's life support system. If we don't reverse it quickly, we're not going to be here to tell them. So it became quite imperative to me. It's no longer mandated to make 20 million plus a year. It was mandated to come up with technology that were to survive. But in order to do this and accomplish it, the requirement is we must legalize the technology. Zero in, when I did an analysis to the energy problem, it became quite obvious that water was the fuel source.

[29:20] But I knew from my prior experience and the degrees of difficulty in bringing in technology, it wasn't going to be brought in by me. Now, after I did an analysis of what had been the problem, I asked a simple prayer. Sometimes I have regretted and asked them this prayer. I said, God, I love my country. It's the greatest country in the world. If you help me cross the line of country, I will do anything that you want me to do. You see, in being an architect at Evelyn, I learned the wheeling and dealing and manipulation by technology and control in the border areas. I know about the world banking system in Malta. The corporate entity controls my technology and suppression. And in order for me to be successful, it was going to take, which I had a lack of. I had the ability to do it, but I did not have faith. So the Lord gave me faith. I had to ask for prayer. And I zeroed in and it became quite obvious.

Why water

[32:43] water was a fantastic fuel source because if you drive your car on gasoline-inducing fuel, many people do not realize you're actually running off of hydrogen. Gasoline-inducing fuel has about a half a pound of hydrogen into it. Water, on the other hand, has two and a half times more hydrogen atoms to it than gasoline. It's an extremely powerful fuel. So in development, If I may be able to use water as a fuel source, not a chemical process, then I would now have an ability to bring a new energy source into the economies of the world. But you must understand as an inventor that you are only one individual. In order to bring technology in, it must be communicated. In order to bring the water fuel cell into the economies of the world, it's going to not just take Stan Myers. We can invent the technology, we can develop the technology, we can point to an inventor and say, here it is, gentlemen, this is the way to go.

[33:30] If your whale's cut off in any way, you probably might know that during the Gulf War, the U.N. got the U.S. to use armed weapons of the Syracuse Revolution. They used tank projectors that penetrated through the fuselage of the tank, and then if you generated, if you looked at the protogas in the tanks that were blowing carbon, the people would shake, and then carbonized inside out. That was the atomic reaction. It has been confirmed under the Freedom of Information Act that that contaminated, that the oil is contaminated, both radioactive, and so obviously it did it back to keep its promise and use chemical biological weapons over there. And that's what's happening to a lot of our soldiers who have come back with this mysterious Gulf War disease. It's nothing more than exposure to radiation and chemical biological agents. Now that contaminated oil, if it's allowed to get into America, or any country in the world, even in Europe, the internal combustion engine in the car will become the greatest war weapon you've ever met.

[34:25] You know, just imagine if you're standing, stopping behind a car, behind a car, you stop at a red light in the summertime and you breathe in their fumes. If that oil is contaminated by radioactive and chemical biological agents, I will assure you that the eternal combustion engine, if that situation wouldn't be allowed to occur in any country, you could kill off roughly about 220 million Americans and do it in less than two years. And you'd probably kill off 360 million Europeans in about the same time. Now, if that oil is cut off to us by any means, By war or by pressurization, I recently met a very high-level meeting with the Arabs. They have confirmed, in fact, that their pressure and their fields are depressurizing. They are depressurizing three times faster than occurred in the United States. We've easily calculated and determined that we have roughly about eight years' supply of oil coming out of the pennies in order to maintain the industrial base of the Western world.

War and pollution

[35:16] The Arabs have proclaimed a holy war and since time has opened the doors for Western technology, the Arabs get themselves well turned 180 degrees out of the base and sell the remaining oil to the Chinese because the Chinese wants to industrialize and that would leave the Western world without a supply of fossil fuel in order to maintain the industrial base. And whether or not that oil is cut off by nuclear weapons, or it's cut off by war, or it's cut off by contamination, I will assure you that this nation and every nation in the world will be brought to war in a period of two, three, four months. Now, not only are we facing environmental issues, but we're now facing a division that's been swinging from the war. I have been in high-level meetings with the Russians. The Ukraine area is an example. They had enough energy to sow half of their crops last year. They had no energy to harvest their crops at the end of the growing season.

[36:13] 158 plus million Russians are now starving. The only time to go to war is when the masses of people start to get hungry. And they're gonna, if they're gonna die of starvation, they're gonna make a decision and say, it's much rather for us to take and stay and die of starvation. I don't know if you've ever seen pictures of children dying from hunger. But I will tell you that when 158 million Russians plus says, okay, we have enough, they'll start making their moves. In the high-level meetings with the Russians, I mean, with the Arabs. The fear is great because they had told me that they had documents to confirm that the European nations will go to war and go into those nations to capture whatever remaining oil source that is there. The United States, of course, will protect their engines. The Russians will certainly make their efforts to protect their areas of engines and energy. And you have the Chinese that says, okay, we want to maintain and expand our industrial base.

[37:09] And then, of course, you have all the pollution problems that are occurring. If you want to talk about being in a very critical situation, it's all right to answer a fast prayer. Say, Lord, can you answer me please? Most generally, when you start making announcements about technology, they don't understand what you really are envisioning and what you're seeing. You have to make the decision, I am an individual and receive. Now, when you develop technology, Put the blinds on. Go and pursue your technology and don't listen to others who are going to say, pass, I'll get it. Now, most generally, you present a fantastic new way of doing something. They'll inspect your roses, they'll pat you on the back, and say, hey, brother, what a wonderful thing you've done. Most generally, they'll, they'll lambast you, they'll evade you, they will criticize you, and you'll get an enormous amount of hate. And unfortunately, there are a little bit of what's called an ego problem in the scientific world.

[38:01] Has anybody ever encountered that? and the videotape that we show here at the conference, Professor Seid said, and which is absolutely true, there are scientists that don't like non-science people inventing things, because they don't have a caretaker. So they have the potential, they have all of the background and education in the areas that they're the ones in to come up with these creative ideas, and most certainly it doesn't come from them, it comes from you and I and the mission. We have a challenge before us. If you have no idea that you are looking at, you are the only people, you are the only ones in America, and perhaps even in the world, has come together and said we must do something to solve the energy problem. How many people are here, what, 220 million people in the United States, and how many are here today concerned on how to develop technology, to create biotechnology on the marketplace and to be able to sustain and reverse the problems that is confronting us today?

[39:03] They're very few. The whole world, whether you like it or not, are going to be relying on you. And if you can't come up with the answer, nobody will. You have to understand they're not going to support you. They're not going to pat you on the back. They're not going to give you the financial support. But I will tell you that they must rely on you to get it accomplished. And if you do not accomplish it, then I'm afraid that you know the economies of the world today will no longer be. I love this water. This water is a fantastic fuel source. It can solve the energy problem, and it can break the hole that we're under by the Arabs in controlling the fuel supply chain in the United States.

Address the scientific problem

[39:51] Take your analysis as to why. What is the problem? Technically, address the scientific problem. The scientific problem found was that, oh, hey, gasoline only had a half a ton of hydrogen in the water. It has, at the beginning of time, more energy and a nice real advantage than gasoline. And we also saw the environmental pollution problem because in the molecular structure of water, you have two hydrogen atoms and one oxygen atom. So we don't have a carbon atom to what the key was. How can we unlock and release this energy economically and do it in a way that can be used as fuel source?

[40:26] And of course, we found out that if you can do this, pound per pound, one pound of water is equal basically to one pound of natural gas. The beautiful part is that water supplies its own oxygen. The water fuel cell is totally in compliance with the U.S. National Security Energy Act of 1992, which said any fuel source retrofitted to the Earth must be oxygenated. Over the years of technology, this has been confirmed by the United States government and others. As a matter of fact, very recently we got the UN to make the major announcement to the world, stop running all internal combustion engines on fossil fuels and do it now. Because of the greenhouse effect. You think we have adverse weather conditions now? Wait for the next five, six to ten years as the temperatures rise, we're going to have greater and greater climatical disruption.

[41:19] He was regressed. Now, many things that are there, and inventors realize one thing, that there are many phenomenons in nature that we do not understand and are right before us. Many times the Lord says to me, we have eyes, but we do not see. We have ears, but we do not hear. But that creative thought, invented back in his garage, in the basement backyard, starts to say, ah, there may be a little bit different way of doing something. Address the scientific problem. In this particular case, how can we break the bonding of the water molecule? It was very obvious the water molecule was bipolarly charged. Here before, in the field of science, we assume. Now, you know what the theory is, gentlemen?

Theory is an educated guess

[42:10] The theory is nothing more than an educated guess. And if you ever look at the calculations, you see little numbers, 1, 2, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10 equations. And you say, what is that? Well, that's called the fuzz factor. And normally when science sees a phenomenon, they try to define it mathematically. But if it doesn't work mathematically, they put the buzz factors in it in order to come out right or to what they perceive as to be correct under this theory. Now, in the scientific world, what happens is that you get all of these guys taking one theory and correlating it with another theory and correlating it with another theory and arriving at a conclusion based on a theory. And automatically, their assumption is totally, absolutely wrong because they have based their conclusion on a theory which is not law.

[43:05] And so when we look at things and say this is a theory, it's an only guesstimate and testament way of what and how something is working based on the understanding that we have in the scientific world today. Look at the touch pad and start considering maybe this should be looked at in a slightly different way. And many, many times scientists get boxed in to this theory and can't get out of the theory box. and therefore they become blinded to actual, real research and development. Now here, in the scientific world for many years, they made the assumption that the water molecule or liquid molecules and gas molecules were held together by the lentil magnetic force. Well, you have to learn to ask certain questions, and this one was, well, what happens when the unlighted atoms of the water molecule comes together? That's a nice question to ask. So, what on the ball of physics is the L word in the oxygen atom, which by itself is normally eight protons and eight electrons?

The water molecule

[44:08] Well, you know, when the oxygen atom accepts the two negative electrons, they're like an atom. And on the ball of physics, the L word in the L word can accept up to eight electrons. So when the unlike atoms of the water molecule comes together, there's an unlikely balance that occurs. Now we have eight protons, but we've got ten electrons, and therefore the oxygen atom swings to the negative electrical charge. Wait a minute.

[44:35] What happens to the hydrogen atom? Well, the hydrogen atom is now sharing its negative charge with the electron, and the positive charge of the proton now calls the hydrogen atom as the positive electrical charge, and therefore the water molecule becomes a biophore. They let them recharge the water molecule.

[44:52] Next question. Is the ionite and the water molecule held together by ionite? We'll look at it for us. The answer is no, because once the oxidant accepts two negative charged electrons at the height of the atom, those electrons spin in an opposite direction and the oxidant does not take on the electromagnetic charge. So there is no electromagnetic charge between the anionic atoms. They are being held together by an electrical attraction force. And that electrical attraction force is equal to the equivalent of two charged negative electrons in an all-physical rare reaction as well. An equal and opposite reaction.

[45:30] But when that reality came into play, that was a thing that became very obvious then as the world had shown me, and it exposed the water molecules to an opposite voltage potential, you now would be able to pull apart the water molecule in a physical process, not in a chemical process based on Faraday's law, using Kern. So we knew under Keelan's law, and Newton's second law was like a little forest, that whenever you would expose an electrically charged particle to opposite voltage zones, We're going to get an electrical ejection force that's going to move the electrical charge particles and that's all. But not the negative charge that's going to be affecting the positive electrical voltage field. If you shut off the flow of energy and you now create a negative voltage field, would you not get a repelling action where the negative voltage field is now repelling the negative charge oxygen and atom?

[46:16] It's not unknown, but basically the voltage absolutely does, can actually perform work. TD7 and the computer monitor has a voltage grid on the back of the screen that will continue the voltage, the brightness control, erases the voltage on the grid, which now also is made with our electron, and that electron strikes before us in the screen, and that's how you get a brighter light intensity.

[46:39] So we knew in fact that now if you were to expose the water molecule to oxygen in both these fields, electrical attraction forces would also turn above, and we'd be able to pull the oxygen out of the molecule, and that's exactly what happened. When the negative charge oxygen atom would not be attracted to the positive voltage field, it's stationary, not movable. When now the hydrogen atom would be attracted to the negative voltage field, and therefore we're now elongating the water molecule, Now we're now starting to elongate the water molecule. We're now starting to change the time-share rate of the electrons. We get to a point in space distance between the atomized gas that all of a sudden the hydrogen atom must maintain under its negative intelligence, it must maintain that electron. And so it starts to throw off the electron, but it cannot capture the electron that's being given by the oxygen atom.

[47:26] And finally the oxygen hydrogen atom recaptures the electron and separation occurs.

Covalent switch-off

[47:32] But then what happens is covalent switch-off occurs. You see, we've now taken the optoelectrical stress, which is applied across the water molecule, and now it's being applied across the atoms of the water molecule. So now we're not applying the charge of emptiness at the atom. The water molecule atom will be attracted to the negative omega field. On a global basis, the constant charges will what? Attract. And light charges will what? Repel. We're not now in the negative charge electron orbit around the atom. It did not get drafted into the positive voltage field. And therefore, we're now elongating the atoms of the water molecule. And as we elongate it, and we put a label of stress across it, loss of polarity, the spin velocity of the electron is reduced down. And under the electromagnetic theory of magnetism says that whenever a really dark particle passes through an electrostatic field, it's byproducts of electromagnetic energy.

[48:28] So if you slow down the spin velocity of the electron, you now reduce the electromagnetic force fields of the atom. And as a result, you now have covalent switch off. Now what are the forces that affects the atoms? There's electrical force, electromagnetic force, weak and strong and good force, and gravity. Which one affects the others? Both.

Eyes, but do not see

[48:47] They have eyes, but they do not see. They have ears, but they do not hear. The Lord said that knowledge will come out of time, and great job.

[48:57] In order to do this, we're going to invent the BIC circuit. And when we're talking about developing the technology of maturity and technology, we now use the water as an electronic component of the circuit, developing, inventing the BIC circuit. That water, since it has eight electrons and it's out of water, the LR of the water is the ion-electric liquid to pulsating DC current.

[49:21] And so therefore, if you put two bulking zones between the dielectric material, whether it's liquid or solid, what do you have in front of you guys? Any capacity, do you not? If you put a coil on the opposite side of the passenger, you now have a resonant pulse circuit. And so when you tune the pulse frequency of the circuit, tuning in the dielectric value of water, you're now allowing the voltage to go through the coils, and after the circuit is occurring, the therefore voltage is now pulling apart the water molecule, and you're using federal energy in order to pull apart the water molecule now because you're preventing the electron, consuming electrical power by preventing the electrons through the circuit.

[49:59] There's another schematic note. Note what I said earlier. Make drawings of your inventions and describe them. Put it in words. Do not allow others to define your puzzles.

Collecting the electrons

[50:14] Now, in developing the technology, we had to learn the phenomenons of putting off the rolling spills across the water molecule, and all of a sudden we were releasing hydrogen, not to gas and water, not on linear function as to the prior electrolysis process, but now we're releasing energy on an equitable curve. the higher the voltage, we found out that the more gas is being generated. And we tested it on all natural water and found out that the electrical pulsation and pulsation occurs in all forms of natural water, even including the most purest form of distilled water. And when I took this down to North Coast Steel, presence of three businesses and four chemists, when they put the most purified ionized water in it, the most pure quality distilled water. We were producing pounds and pounds of hydrogen and gas and I will tell you when we sat down we had the most interesting conversation for the next hour or so and say at least he wanted us to go back.

[51:08] Now we're taking the rates of the bullets fired and we're collecting the electrons. We're starting to ionize the water and the gases from the water. We found out that when you tune into the constant resonance of the water, we're starting to act as an energy generator. Now, gentlemen, all the energy that's coming into our third dimension is coming through the atomic structure.

[51:29] Does that sound unfamiliar to you? You know, in the discovery of other dimensions, Thomas Edison oscillated the atom on a particle oscillation as an energy generated by way of current flow, and that was the invention of the light bulb. Google came along and caused the atom to absorb photon energy and re-radiate it, and that was the invention of the laser.

[51:51] The precursor to that is the matrix where we learn in the scientific community that if we can cause the atom to absorb electronic energy and radiate it, that was the problem with telecommunications. In this process, we learn that we can oscillate the atom, articulate it on a voltage signal in the space-space by pulsating electrical stress. It turns out that being electrical stress has the greatest difference of potential and causes to oscillate the atom as an energy generator. Now let me give you an example about this energy that we're talking about. How is it that a fetus in a mother's womb can undergo atomic destruction to give us life? A mother doesn't take in enough lutein nutrients or enough solar energy to be born atomic destruction. How is it that a fetus undergoes atomic destruction to give us life? How is it that you can take a seed of a plant and put it in the ground to grow a tree 90 foot high?

[52:45] The tree doesn't take in enough nutrients and enough solar energy to create one atomic structure. The nutrients and the solar energy are nothing but gross stimulators. How is it that the tree has the ability to create atoms, to create molecules, to create chemical processes to have the same life? Any of you ever ask that question? I am. It's called Miracle of Life. Einstein said that if you keep your hands in the opposite direction, somewhere along the line your hands are going to meet. It means that our universe is circular in nature. The red effect of astronomy shows that our universe is expanding at a fantastic alarming rate. How is it that mass is being created in our universe?

[53:26] You have to ask the question and then remember to, the question has to be formulated first, so you can take the action at the point.

Einstein, and particle physics

[53:35] Einstein was the equation and he was master of the square of light, the reason why he squared the potential of light because that potential of light was greater than that of the third dimension and therefore the atom is nothing more than an energy translator that transmits energy from outside of the third dimension into our third dimension that gets us and life is created and sustained and maintained by that energy source. And that phenomenon is being confirmed in many, many areas now. and how we can take the water molecule, separate it from the electrical stress, ignite the gases, release the energy, form the water molecule, take it right back again to the closed loop system, go back, separate the water molecule again, light it again, release the energy, and continuously do this, continuously, and you're never destroying the atom. You're only flexing the atom in order to release the energy, and that's what remains, stains, stains all of our bottom line science that's on Earth.

[54:27] So everything that you're developing over the energy, gentlemen, you are learning how to do particle oscillations as an energy generator. You can do a physical impact, you can get heat energy out of it, you can call some sort of photon energy, or electromagnetic energy, you can get it to radiate it. How is it, for example, that you take a sound, put it in the trunk, and amplify the sound, go clear across the soccer field, and a guy makes a goal, and there's 800, there's 80,000 people on the stand screaming, you sure can hear that trumpet, right? And a trumpet is there as an amplifier that it amplifies and it's an only unit device. There's very little energy to do it. It's a triggering device. A thermonuclear device, the energy coming through a nuclear device is not coming from the atomic structure. There's not enough energy in the atom to cause that type of destruction. To give you a classic example of electronics, I can take the electron and move it through a resistive element and I get one exponent of heat.

[55:26] Now the proton is 1,840 times greater than that of the electron, and therefore, if I would move the electron through the resistor, I'd get the heat going 1,840 times. Basically, in thermonuclear technology, what they're doing is ratcheting the energy aperture of the atom, and it's releasing this energy in a very finite way. The key is, how can you use this energy? in such a way that we can do it under control state. And on your energy devices, which are many, that's what you're doing. That's what you're trying to accomplish. How can you tap into energy source? How can you tap into zero energy? How can you utilize this energy and put it into a controlled form? You just have to be more than able to go through the water.

Burn rate, and spark

[56:08] Now we had to develop and learn how to adjust the burn rate of nitrogen gas, fossil fuel, burning rates. That was developed to give us a rigid energy system that was simply accomplished by mixing with non-combustible gases that now will reduce the speed by which the hydrogen and oxygen atom would come together and reduce its energy.

[56:30] When you step back, we developed a system for energy spark back that was developed at Winchester to go to Twin Mountains. Illustration of this was if you have a pipe tube and you build up a pipe in an engine air at 91 inches, the burn makes around 325 centimeters a second. If you took natural gas in the engine air, it burns around 42 centimeters.