Medium remanence and coercivity, two ways
The same calculation run twice, side by side. Change anything on either side and the difference is shown output by output. This page is a link: both sets of numbers are in the address bar.
What changed
The two sides are the same. Change something on either.
| Output | A | B | B against A |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mr Medium remanence | 12 A/m | 12 A/m | same |
| Hc Coercivity | 80 A/m | 80 A/m | same |
| q Remanence ratio | 0.000141 | 0.000141 | same |
Side A, with its numbers
LaTeX
12\,\mathrm{A/m} = 5\,\mathrm{%} \cdot 240\,\mathrm{A/m}
- Soft Iron (carbonyl, soft) keeps almost nothing: 240 A/m per particle against a saturation of 1700 kA/m — the slug that leaves the coil is nearly blank, at a remanence ratio of 0.00014. A hard particulate is the lever: the remanence of a multi-domain sphere is about three times its coercivity, so a material with a hundred times the coercivity carries a hundred times the magnetisation out of the coil.
Side B, with its numbers
LaTeX
12\,\mathrm{A/m} = 5\,\mathrm{%} \cdot 240\,\mathrm{A/m}
- Soft Iron (carbonyl, soft) keeps almost nothing: 240 A/m per particle against a saturation of 1700 kA/m — the slug that leaves the coil is nearly blank, at a remanence ratio of 0.00014. A hard particulate is the lever: the remanence of a multi-domain sphere is about three times its coercivity, so a material with a hundred times the coercivity carries a hundred times the magnetisation out of the coil.