Skip to content
Stan’s Legacy The Stanley Meyer Archive

Medium susceptibility

How strongly does this medium magnetise per unit field?

The formula
χ=φ⁢χi1+χi/3+1−φ⁢χc
χ
Medium susceptibility
φ
Volume fraction of particulate, %
χi
Intrinsic per-particle susceptibility
χc
Carrier susceptibility
LaTeX
χ = φ \cdot \frac{χi}{1 + χi / 3} + (1 - φ) \cdot χc

Work it out

What the particulate is suspended in. Contributes its own small susceptibility — negative for every liquid offered.

The magnetic solid. Sets the saturation magnetisation and the single-domain limit.

%

The solid's share of the volume. The medium's susceptibility and its saturation both scale with it.

µm

Decides which picture applies: below the material's single-domain limit, Langevin; above it, a demagnetisation-limited soft sphere.

°C

Only the single-domain susceptibility depends on it — thermal motion is what a superparamagnet fights.

Method

  1. Compare the particle diameter with the material's single-domain limit — 15 nm for iron, 80 for magnetite, a micron for barium ferrite.
  2. Below it the particle is one moment of Ms·V, and its initial susceptibility is the Langevin slope μ₀Ms²V ÷ 3k_BT. It grows with the cube of the diameter and is already in the tens for a ten-nanometre magnetite grain.
  3. Above it the particle is a soft ferromagnet with an intrinsic initial susceptibility of order a thousand. The exact figure hardly matters, for the next reason.
  4. A sphere demagnetises itself: its apparent susceptibility is χ_i ÷ (1 + χ_i/3), which is 3 for any large χ_i. Micron iron shows 2.99, not 1000.
  5. Weight the particle's figure by the volume fraction and the carrier's by the rest. The carrier's is negative and of order 10⁻⁵ — negligible against any loading, everything at none.
  6. The medium saturates at φ·Ms, and the field that gets it there is that over χ.

Assumptions

  • Particles that do not feel each other — the dilute limit. Above a few per cent the neighbours' fields raise the effective susceptibility somewhat (a Clausius–Mossotti-style correction), and in chains far more; treat the figure as a floor at heavy loading.
  • The multi-domain intrinsic susceptibility of 1000 is an order of magnitude for a soft, annealed material. A cold-worked or oxidised powder is lower, but any figure above about 30 gives the same demagnetisation-limited answer of 3 within a tenth, which is why the sphere's shape rather than the material's purity decides the number.
  • Low field. The susceptibility is the initial slope; the medium follows it until it approaches φ·Ms and then flattens, and the field-to-saturate output is where the two lines cross, not where the curve actually bends.
  • The temperature enters only the single-domain case. The carrier's susceptibility and the multi-domain figure are taken at room temperature.
  • Nothing here is Meyer's. The estate material specifies a speed for the medium and no loading, size or material; the calculation exists because the magnetisation inside the drive coil is 3φH for a micron iron slurry and the carrier's own few parts per million without one, and the difference is the whole question.