Skip to content
Stan’s Legacy

VIC5 - 6x Parallel Tubular

Experimental VIC5 with 6-cell parallel array for high current.

From the archive's library.

The parts

The drive no drive was saved with it; these are the engine's defaults

kHz

The pulse frequency the loop is driven at.

V

The peak voltage applied across the loop — after the transformer, if there is one.

%

How much of each pulse period the drive is on.

Hz

The slow gate switching the pulse train on and off.

%

How much of each gate period the pulses are let through.

Separate, or on one core with fields aiding or opposing.

How much of one choke's flux threads the other. Zero for separate cores.

From the parts

Every number handed to the simulation that you did not type, and where it came from. Each derivation that ran a calculation links to that calculation's page with these numbers in, so it can be checked alone.

  • σ On the way 125 µS/cm

    Tap Water (Soft)'s conductivity, from its dissolved solids reading.

    Dissolved solids to conductivity

  • L₁ Charging choke 31.42 mH

    The charging choke's inductance: 100 turns on MnZn Ferrite E-Core (μᵣ 2000, 1 cm², 8 cm path).

    Inductance of a winding on a core — 1 note on that page

  • L₂ Blocking choke 31.42 mH

    The blocking choke's inductance: 100 turns on MnZn Ferrite E-Core (μᵣ 2000, 1 cm², 8 cm path).

    Inductance of a winding on a core — 1 note on that page

  • R Series resistance 0.2423 Ω

    Series resistance, added up: Bifilar Choke 2 - 100T AWG18 (Finish-Finish) 0.0962 Ω + Bifilar Choke 2 - 100T AWG18 (Finish-Finish) 0.0962 Ω + Tubular - 6x Parallel (High Capacity) 0.05 Ω. Wiring and connections are not counted.

  • C Cell capacitance 4.627 nF

    One tube of Tubular - 6x Parallel (High Capacity) — 0.75 in over 1 in, 12 in long — in tap water (typical) at 20 °C.

    Coaxial cell capacitance — 1 note on that page

  • C Cell capacitance 27.76 nF

    6 such cells in parallel. The inductance handed to the array calculation is the two chokes added plainly, for its resonance figure only; the capacitance does not depend on it.

    Multi-cell array — 2 notes on that page

  • Cell leak resistance 2.003 Ω

    The leak across one tube, from its geometry and Tap Water (Soft) at 125 µS/cm. 6 such cells in parallel leak 6 times as readily, so this is one 6th of that.

    Leak resistance across a tubular cell — 1 note on that page

  • V Drive amplitude 60 V

    The drive amplitude of 12 V stepped up through Forward Mode 1:5 Step-Up (100:500). The 1 A primary current given to the ratio calculation is for its current figures only; the voltage ratio does not depend on it.

    Transformer step-up to the cell

  • Both chokes are recorded as bifilar windings, but the arrangement is set to independent. If they share a core, choose an aiding or opposing arrangement and a coupling coefficient.

Result

f₀ Resonant frequency 3.811 kHz

Where the loop — both chokes and the cell — actually rings. Compare with the drive frequency.

L Loop inductance 62.83 mH

Both chokes together, with the mutual term if they are coupled.

M Mutual inductance 0 mH

Signed: positive aiding, negative opposing, zero if independent.

Z Characteristic impedance 1.504 kΩ

√(L/C) — what the loop looks like at resonance before resistance.

Q Q factor 6209

How sharp the resonance is against the series resistance.

U Resonant rise 372.5 kV

The cell voltage at resonance — Q times the drive.

ζ Damping ratio 8.053e-5

Below 1 the loop rings after each pulse; above 1 it sags.

τ Decay time constant 518.6 ms

How fast the ring dies away.

I Peak current 17.78 mA

What the drive pushes at the drive frequency, not at resonance.

W Average power 19.15 µW

Dissipated in the resistance, averaged over pulses and gate.

n Pulses per gate 50

How many pulses arrive before the gate closes.

S Staircase peak 60 V

Where the step-charge staircase tops out against the leak, after n pulses.

With your numbers
3.811kHz=12π62.83mH·27.76nF
LaTeX
3.811\,\mathrm{kHz} = \frac{1}{2\pi \sqrt{62.83\,\mathrm{mH} \cdot 27.76\,\mathrm{nF}}}

Worth knowing

  • Q factor and voltage rise — A Q of 6209 is very high for a circuit with water in it, and implies a bandwidth of only 0.6138 Hz. Confirm the series resistance includes the cell’s own losses — using just the choke’s winding resistance is the usual way to arrive at a Q like this on paper and not on the bench.
  • Q factor and voltage rise — A predicted 372.5 kV across the cell is past where insulation, standoffs and the water itself hold up. Check the field strength across the gap before trusting this.
  • Current and power under a pulsed drive — The drive is at 2.62× the loop's resonance (3.81 kHz). The net reactance of 3.37 kΩ is what limits the current here, not the resistance; on resonance the same drive would push 248 A.
  • Step charging accumulation — Only 0% of the voltage survives between pulses, so there is no staircase — each pulse is very nearly starting from nothing. The cell is discharging through the water faster than it is being charged.
  • Step charging accumulation — The burst reaches 2% of what perfect retention would give. Raising the drive frequency shortens the gap between pulses and helps; raising the water resistance helps far more.
  • The drive is at 10 kHz and the loop rings at 3.81 kHz — 2.62× resonance. The resonant rise of 373 kV above is what this loop would do driven on resonance; at the drive frequency the cell sees the drive through 3.37 kΩ of reactance instead. Either move the drive or change a choke so the two agree.

This result is a link — the address bar holds your numbers, so it can be pasted into a post and opened to the same answer.

The working, step by step

  1. The drive as timing: how long each pulse is, how many fit inside one gate, and what fraction of the time the drive is on.

    With these numbers
    100µs=110kHz50µs=100µs·50%10050=50%100·10kHz100Hz25%=50%·50%100
    LaTeX
    100\,\mathrm{µs} = \frac{1}{10\,\mathrm{kHz}} \qquad 50\,\mathrm{µs} = 100\,\mathrm{µs} \cdot \frac{50\,\mathrm{%}}{100} \qquad 50 = \left\lfloor \frac{50\,\mathrm{%}}{100} \cdot \frac{10\,\mathrm{kHz}}{100\,\mathrm{Hz}} \right\rfloor \qquad 25\,\mathrm{%} = \frac{50\,\mathrm{%} \cdot 50\,\mathrm{%}}{100}

    Open this step on its own page, with these inputs

  2. 2. Two chokes on one core

    L 62.83 mH

    The two chokes as the loop sees them — their sum, plus or minus the mutual term if they share a core.

    With these numbers
    0mH=±031.42mH·31.42mH62.83mH=31.42mH+31.42mH+2·0mH31.42mH=31.42mH+0mH
    LaTeX
    0\,\mathrm{mH} = \pm 0 \sqrt{31.42\,\mathrm{mH} \cdot 31.42\,\mathrm{mH}} \qquad 62.83\,\mathrm{mH} = 31.42\,\mathrm{mH} + 31.42\,\mathrm{mH} + 2 \cdot 0\,\mathrm{mH} \qquad 31.42\,\mathrm{mH} = 31.42\,\mathrm{mH} + 0\,\mathrm{mH}

    Open this step on its own page, with these inputs

  3. Where that inductance and the cell ring.

    With these numbers
    3.811kHz=12π62.83mH·27.76nF
    LaTeX
    3.811\,\mathrm{kHz} = \frac{1}{2\pi\sqrt{62.83\,\mathrm{mH} \cdot 27.76\,\mathrm{nF}}}

    Open this step on its own page, with these inputs

  4. How sharply, against everything resistive in the loop, and how far the cell voltage rises above the drive on resonance.

    With these numbers
    6209=10.2423Ω62.83mH27.76nF372.5kV=6209·60V
    LaTeX
    6209 = \frac{1}{0.2423\,\mathrm{Ω}}\sqrt{\frac{62.83\,\mathrm{mH}}{27.76\,\mathrm{nF}}} \qquad 372.5\,\mathrm{kV} = 6209 \cdot 60\,\mathrm{V} \qquad 0.6138\,\mathrm{Hz} = \frac{3.811\,\mathrm{kHz}}{6209}
    • A Q of 6209 is very high for a circuit with water in it, and implies a bandwidth of only 0.6138 Hz. Confirm the series resistance includes the cell’s own losses — using just the choke’s winding resistance is the usual way to arrive at a Q like this on paper and not on the bench.
    • A predicted 372.5 kV across the cell is past where insulation, standoffs and the water itself hold up. Check the field strength across the gap before trusting this.

    Open this step on its own page, with these inputs

  5. 5. Damping and ringdown

    ζ 8.053e-5

    What happens after each pulse: whether the loop rings or sags, and for how long.

    With these numbers
    8.053e-5=0.2423Ω227.76nF62.83mH518.6ms=2·62.83mH0.2423Ω3.811kHz=12π162.83mH·27.76nF1518.6ms24551=ln10π·10.2423Ω62.83mH27.76nF
    LaTeX
    8.053e-5 = \frac{0.2423\,\mathrm{Ω}}{2} \sqrt{\frac{27.76\,\mathrm{nF}}{62.83\,\mathrm{mH}}} \qquad 518.6\,\mathrm{ms} = \frac{2 \cdot 62.83\,\mathrm{mH}}{0.2423\,\mathrm{Ω}} \qquad 3.811\,\mathrm{kHz} = \frac{1}{2\pi} \sqrt{\frac{1}{62.83\,\mathrm{mH} \cdot 27.76\,\mathrm{nF}} - \frac{1}{518.6\,\mathrm{ms}^{2}}} \qquad 4551 = \frac{\ln 10}{\pi} \cdot \frac{1}{0.2423\,\mathrm{Ω}} \sqrt{\frac{62.83\,\mathrm{mH}}{27.76\,\mathrm{nF}}}

    Open this step on its own page, with these inputs

  6. What the drive is asked for at the frequency it actually runs at — which is the resonance only if the two agree.

    With these numbers
    3.375=2π10kHz·62.83mH12π10kHz·27.76nF3.375=0.2423Ω2+3.375217.78mA=60V3.37576.6µW=17.78mA2·0.2423Ω19.15µW=76.6µW·25%1003.83nJ=76.6µW·50µs
    LaTeX
    3.375\,\mathrm{kΩ} = 2\pi 10\,\mathrm{kHz} \cdot 62.83\,\mathrm{mH} - \frac{1}{2\pi 10\,\mathrm{kHz} \cdot 27.76\,\mathrm{nF}} \qquad 3.375\,\mathrm{kΩ} = \sqrt{0.2423\,\mathrm{Ω}^{2} + 3.375\,\mathrm{kΩ}^{2}} \qquad 17.78\,\mathrm{mA} = \frac{60\,\mathrm{V}}{3.375\,\mathrm{kΩ}} \qquad 76.6\,\mathrm{µW} = 17.78\,\mathrm{mA}^{2} \cdot 0.2423\,\mathrm{Ω} \qquad 19.15\,\mathrm{µW} = 76.6\,\mathrm{µW} \cdot \frac{25\,\mathrm{%}}{100} \qquad 3.83\,\mathrm{nJ} = 76.6\,\mathrm{µW} \cdot 50\,\mathrm{µs}
    • The drive is at 2.62× the loop's resonance (3.81 kHz). The net reactance of 3.37 kΩ is what limits the current here, not the resistance; on resonance the same drive would push 248 A.

    Open this step on its own page, with these inputs

  7. The pulse train against the cell and its leak: does the charge accumulate into a staircase, or drain away between pulses?

    With these numbers
    0.0556µs=2.003Ω·27.76nF0=e100µs/0.0556µs60V=60V·105010
    LaTeX
    0.0556\,\mathrm{µs} = 2.003\,\mathrm{Ω} \cdot 27.76\,\mathrm{nF} \qquad 0 = e^{-100\,\mathrm{µs}/0.0556\,\mathrm{µs}} \qquad 60\,\mathrm{V} = 60\,\mathrm{V} \cdot \frac{1 - 0^{50}}{1 - 0}
    • Only 0% of the voltage survives between pulses, so there is no staircase — each pulse is very nearly starting from nothing. The cell is discharging through the water faster than it is being charged.
    • The burst reaches 2% of what perfect retention would give. Raising the drive frequency shortens the gap between pulses and helps; raising the water resistance helps far more.

    Open this step on its own page, with these inputs

What this looks like

Resonant frequency against cell capacitance Cell capacitance swept from 13.9 nF to 41.6 nF with everything else held at your numbers. The dashed lines cross where you are.
Resonant frequency against cell capacitanceResonant frequency falls from 5.39 kHz to 3.11 kHz as cell capacitance rises from 13.9 nF to 41.6 nF. At your cell capacitance of 27.8 nF it is 3.81 kHz.33.544.555.5102030405027.8 nF3.81 kHzCell capacitance (nF)Resonant frequency (kHz)
The formula behind the curve
f₀=12πL·C
f₀
Resonant frequency, Hz
L
Loop inductance, mH
C
Cell capacitance, nF
LaTeX
f₀ = \frac{1}{2\pi \sqrt{L \cdot C}}
What moves the answer Each input moved 10% either way, with the others held still, and the effect on resonant frequency.
What moves the answerResonant frequency is most sensitive to Cell capacitance, which moves it by about 5.41% for a 10% change. It is least sensitive to Cell leak resistance, at about 0%.Change in the answer when each input moves by 10%-10%-5%5%10%Cell capacitance±5.41Charging choke±2.6Blocking choke±2.6Coupling coefficient±0Series resistance±0Drive frequency±0Drive amplitude±0Pulse duty±0Gate frequency±0Gate duty±0Cell leak resistance±0
The formula behind the curve
f₀=12πL·C
f₀
Resonant frequency, Hz
L
Loop inductance, mH
C
Cell capacitance, nF
LaTeX
f₀ = \frac{1}{2\pi \sqrt{L \cdot C}}

Open the bare numbers — the same simulation on its own page, every derived value editable.