Skip to content
Stan’s Legacy The Stanley Meyer Archive

The archive

What’s new

Everything the archive has gained lately, newest first. Also as a feed for whatever you read feeds with.

August 2026

  • calculation · EPG · · added 1 month ago

    EPG design session v4: best candidate (η=59.6%, 231.3W)

    **Sweep** — Separate hydraulic cost from induced EMF via velocity sweep, push modulation depth at lower copper via pitch-vs-coil-length, and evaluate at the matched ~40Ω load inste...

  • design note · VIC · · added 1 month ago

    VIC design session v71: reasoning

    This sweep confirms a hard wall I keep hitting: with C_eff pinned at 1.37nF and L held down at 0.0001H to preserve coil Q, f_r sits at 303.9kHz — a factor of ~3-6 above my practica...

  • design note · VIC · · added 1 month ago

    VIC design session v73: reasoning

    This sweep was supposed to hold coil Q and the ~120 Td window steady while pushing C_eff up to drag f_r into the 40-70 kHz band — but the results tell me the experiment was mis-spe...

  • design note · VIC · · added 1 month ago

    VIC design session v74: reasoning

    Lab note — VIC resonant sweep, 90 candidates. The headline result is a failure I need to own: the session's stated goal was to drag f_r down from ~300kHz into the 40-70kHz band by...

  • design note · VIC · · added 1 month ago

    VIC design session v78: reasoning

    Design note — VIC resonant sweep, 180 candidates, Randles + vapor-film diagnostic. The headline result is a negative one I have to be honest about: the frequency lever did not actu...

  • design note · VIC · · added 1 month ago

    VIC design session v79: reasoning

    Ran the sweep to bound f_r sensitivity outside the 4-7mH/55kHz window I'd been living in, and the result is a warning as much as a finding. Every top-scoring candidate the optimize...

  • design note · VIC · · added 1 month ago

    VIC design session v77: reasoning

    This L-up sweep didn't do what I asked, and that's the first honest finding. I meant to raise the choke 5-25x to drag f_r into the 40-70kHz band, but every surviving top candidate...

  • design note · VIC · · added 1 month ago

    VIC design session v83: reasoning

    Lab note — VIC resonant sweep, 144 candidates. The intent this session was to bridge into the mid-L 1.5–3mH region where C_eff=1.37nF alone resonates sub-100kHz without any capacit...

  • design note · VIC · · added 1 month ago

    VIC design session v85: reasoning

    The sweep is telling me something uncomfortable but useful: my scoring function is being led by the vapor-film CGDE diagnostic, and the five top-ranked candidates all sit on the 10...

  • design note · VIC · · added 1 month ago

    VIC design session v82: reasoning

    This sweep was supposed to force the high-L arm — pin 8-10mH chokes to drag f_r down into the buildable band. It didn't take. Every surviving top candidate collapsed back onto the...

  • design note · VIC · · added 1 month ago

    VIC design session v89: reasoning

    This sweep is honest but it's telling me the choke branch is the wrong knob. Every one of the 48 candidates converged on the same cell (1.37nF, 8 tubes parallel) and the same 100µH...

  • design note · WFC · · added 1 month ago

    WFC design session v27: reasoning

    This sweep was supposed to hunt the Td sweet spot from below the 1A ceiling by trading cold-pure Q for warmer, slightly-more-conductive water. It did not get me there, and I want t...

  • design note · VIC · · added 1 month ago

    VIC design session v87: reasoning

    Lab note — VIC resonant sweep, 42 candidates, Randles-cell + vapor-film CGDE diagnostic. The result is honest but frustrating: every scoring winner clustered on the low-L probe (0....

  • design note · VIC · · added 1 month ago

    VIC design session v94: reasoning

    Lab note — VIC resonant sweep, Randles + vapor-film scoring. The intent this session was to force f_r up into the untested 32–50 kHz band with 3.7–9 mH high-turn chokes. The honest...

  • design note · VIC · · added 1 month ago

    VIC design session v98: reasoning

    Lab notebook — VIC resonant sweep, film-Td tuning attempt. The headline result is a negative one, and I'll record it plainly: this sweep did NOT hit its target. I set out to pull V...

  • calculation · VIC · · added 1 month ago

    VIC design session v92: best candidate (Q=1.2, 12.9kHz)

    **Sweep** — Force the 1.37nF (1-2 cell) case: sweep per-choke L 3.7-9mH to land f_r across the untested 32-50kHz compliant band, with high-turn AWG18-22 coils to hold coil Q high w...

  • calculation · WFC · · added 1 month ago

    WFC design session v30: best candidate (Q=13.3, 45.7kHz)

    **Sweep** — Freeze near-v19 tank geometry but attack the Td window directly with a fine electrode-gap × length ladder crossed against a low-mid drive ladder (3-10kV V_cell), holdin...

  • design note · VIC · · added 1 month ago

    VIC design session v101: reasoning

    This sweep confirms a tension the scorer doesn't resolve cleanly. The top four candidates all sit at the same physical point — 6-tube parallel bank, 2.81nF, twin 0.5mH chokes, f_r...

  • calculation · WFC · · added 1 month ago

    WFC design session v31: best candidate (Q=20.7, 64.5kHz)

    **Sweep** — Widen annular gap into 6-9mm to slide the 0.1mm vapor film down into the 80-250 Td CGDE window at ~800V cell, holding cold/pure water for high R_ct/Q, and re-check C_ef...

  • design note · WFC · · added 1 month ago

    WFC design session v33: reasoning

    Lab note — CGDE-window sweep, Randles floor. This run was supposed to walk the vapor-film field down into the 80–250 Td cold-chemistry window by shrinking the gap (sub-3mm) and dri...

  • design note · WFC · · added 1 month ago

    WFC design session v36: reasoning

    This sweep tried to light the vapor film from the water side — drop gap, chill to 4°C, and run 0.2ppm ultrapure so a modest drive lands in the cold-chemistry window — and it expose...

  • design note · WFC · · added 1 month ago

    WFC design session v38: reasoning

    This sweep was supposed to hunt the 700-900V Paschen knee and land the vapor-film in the 80-250 Td cold-chemistry window. It didn't quite. Every top candidate lands at ~886-901V ce...

  • design note · VIC · · added 1 month ago

    VIC design session v106: reasoning

    All five top candidates are effectively the same cell and choke; only duty separates #1–#4 (2/4/8/15%) and #5 swaps to a 620-turn choke. That degeneracy is itself the finding: the...

  • design note · WFC · · added 1 month ago

    WFC design session v40: reasoning

    Lab note — WFC resonant sweep, surface-treatment as the fresh lever. The finer grid confirms the 10mm-in-12mm × 60mm cell as the sweet spot: C_eff 1.58nF resonating my 0.9mH chokes...

  • design note · VIC · · added 1 month ago

    VIC design session v107: reasoning

    This sweep set out to walk peak_v down to land V_cell near 500V, 150-250 Td, with Faradaic leakage under 10mA. It did not get there — and that's the honest headline. Every top cand...

  • calculation · WFC · · added 1 month ago

    WFC design session v40: best candidate (Q=56.5, 94.5kHz)

    **Sweep** — Finer grid at the 10-12mm×60mm best but use surface_factor as the fresh lever to raise C_dl and hold displacement current while low peak_v + cold pure water crush leaka...

  • calculation · WFC · · added 1 month ago

    WFC design session v48: best candidate (Q=14.2, 89.9kHz)

    **Sweep** — Deliberately lower magnification via larger rod OD + wider annular gap to break the ×70 floor, then sweep gamma_se with moderated peak_v/duty to land V_cell at 500-600V...

  • calculation · VIC · · added 1 month ago

    VIC design session v112: best candidate (Q=86.0, 95.4kHz)

    **Sweep** — Hold the AWG18 1mH/200T champ with a fine choke grid and walk peak_v down from bench-proven 120V to land the 470 Td film inside the 80-250 Td CGDE band via lower magnif...

  • calculation · WFC · · added 1 month ago

    WFC design session v44: best candidate (Q=89.2, 98.4kHz)

    **Sweep** — Lower Q via larger rod OD + wider annular gap while trimming peak_v/duty together to push V_cell down from 837V/334Td into the 80-250 Td CGDE window, holding Faradaic l...

  • calculation · VIC · · added 1 month ago

    VIC design session v109: best candidate (Q=24.5, 94.6kHz)

    **Sweep** — Walk peak_v DOWN from bench-proven 120V while holding the AWG18 1mH champ (plus two slightly softer chokes) to drag the 470 Td film back into the 80-250 Td CGDE band an...