Skip to content
Stan’s Legacy The Stanley Meyer Archive

The archive

What’s new

Everything the archive has gained lately, newest first. Also as a feed for whatever you read feeds with.

August 2026

  • calculation · VIC · · added 1 month ago

    VIC design session v113: best candidate (Q=88.7, 95.1kHz)

    **Sweep** — Hold the AWG18 1mH/200T champ choke and drive a DEEP peak_v taper (30-120V, well below prior mild trims) at low duty to walk the 470 Td film down into the 80-250 Td CGD...

  • design note · WFC · · added 1 month ago

    WFC design session v37: reasoning

    This sweep set out to trim Q and peak_v to pull V_cell down into 250–400V so the vapor film would light inside the 80–250 Td cold-chemistry window. It did not get there. Every top...

  • calculation · WFC · · added 1 month ago

    WFC design session v51: best candidate (Q=101.6, 99.5kHz)

    **Sweep** — Finer geometry grid around the adopted 10mm/50mm best while co-sweeping film-relevant levers — moderate gap widening plus colder/purer water to shed Q gently — against...

  • calculation · WFC · · added 1 month ago

    WFC design session v52: best candidate (Q=47.7, 98.6kHz)

    **Sweep** — Walk V_cell off the 334 Td avalanche floor into the 80-250 Td / M=0.1-1 sub-critical corner by co-sweeping the untouched electrode-treatment lever (surface_factor, sets...

  • calculation · WFC · · added 1 month ago

    WFC design session v38: best candidate (Q=55.4, 94.7kHz)

    **Sweep** — Hunt V_cell~700-900V (Paschen knee, 80-250 Td) by hard-trimming peak_v LOW with purer/colder water to hold high R_ct (low leakage) rather than dumping Q with rough/warm...

  • calculation · WFC · · added 1 month ago

    WFC design session v41: best candidate (Q=61.1, 98.2kHz)

    **Sweep** — Co-vary a modest peak_v drop WITH gap/length geometry AND colder/purer water simultaneously (none of the prior single-lever sweeps did this) to walk the 0.1mm film from...

  • design note · WFC · · added 1 month ago

    WFC design session v42: reasoning

    This sweep set out to drop peak_v until V_cell landed in the 500–600V / ~180 Td CGDE window, and it did NOT get there — the top three all sit at 837V across the film, 334 Td, squar...

  • design note · VIC · · added 1 month ago

    VIC design session v108: reasoning

    Ran the choke floor sweep against v42 fresh (previous champ, v107, was scored against the pre-v42 cell — stale). Result: forcing L across 0.3-2mH didn't find anything new, it just...

  • calculation · WFC · · added 1 month ago

    WFC design session v43: best candidate (Q=92.1, 98.2kHz)

    **Sweep** — Hold the adopted 10mm/50mm geometry near best but hunt the 80-250 Td window through the water/electrode Randles levers (purity, temp, surface treatment) + finer low pea...

  • design note · EPG · · added 1 month ago

    EPG design session v5: reasoning

    EPG sweep, 24 Aug 2026 — 480 candidates. The intent this session was threefold: break the I²R wall by dropping to heavier gauge at fixed 2400 turns, push flow velocity past the lam...

  • calculation · VIC · · added 1 month ago

    VIC design session v114: best candidate (Q=89.4, 95.1kHz)

    **Sweep** — Hold choke near the AWG18 1mH/200T champ (fine grid) and deep-taper peak_v to walk the 1179V/470 Td film down into the 80-250 Td CGDE band without touching Q, keeping l...

  • calculation · EPG · · added 1 month ago

    EPG design session v4: best candidate (η=59.6%, 231.3W)

    **Sweep** — Separate hydraulic cost from induced EMF via velocity sweep, push modulation depth at lower copper via pitch-vs-coil-length, and evaluate at the matched ~40Ω load inste...

  • design note · VIC · · added 1 month ago

    VIC design session v71: reasoning

    This sweep confirms a hard wall I keep hitting: with C_eff pinned at 1.37nF and L held down at 0.0001H to preserve coil Q, f_r sits at 303.9kHz — a factor of ~3-6 above my practica...

  • design note · VIC · · added 1 month ago

    VIC design session v73: reasoning

    This sweep was supposed to hold coil Q and the ~120 Td window steady while pushing C_eff up to drag f_r into the 40-70 kHz band — but the results tell me the experiment was mis-spe...

  • design note · VIC · · added 1 month ago

    VIC design session v74: reasoning

    Lab note — VIC resonant sweep, 90 candidates. The headline result is a failure I need to own: the session's stated goal was to drag f_r down from ~300kHz into the 40-70kHz band by...

  • design note · VIC · · added 1 month ago

    VIC design session v78: reasoning

    Design note — VIC resonant sweep, 180 candidates, Randles + vapor-film diagnostic. The headline result is a negative one I have to be honest about: the frequency lever did not actu...

  • design note · VIC · · added 1 month ago

    VIC design session v79: reasoning

    Ran the sweep to bound f_r sensitivity outside the 4-7mH/55kHz window I'd been living in, and the result is a warning as much as a finding. Every top-scoring candidate the optimize...

  • design note · VIC · · added 1 month ago

    VIC design session v77: reasoning

    This L-up sweep didn't do what I asked, and that's the first honest finding. I meant to raise the choke 5-25x to drag f_r into the 40-70kHz band, but every surviving top candidate...

  • design note · VIC · · added 1 month ago

    VIC design session v83: reasoning

    Lab note — VIC resonant sweep, 144 candidates. The intent this session was to bridge into the mid-L 1.5–3mH region where C_eff=1.37nF alone resonates sub-100kHz without any capacit...

  • design note · VIC · · added 1 month ago

    VIC design session v85: reasoning

    The sweep is telling me something uncomfortable but useful: my scoring function is being led by the vapor-film CGDE diagnostic, and the five top-ranked candidates all sit on the 10...

  • design note · VIC · · added 1 month ago

    VIC design session v82: reasoning

    This sweep was supposed to force the high-L arm — pin 8-10mH chokes to drag f_r down into the buildable band. It didn't take. Every surviving top candidate collapsed back onto the...

  • design note · VIC · · added 1 month ago

    VIC design session v89: reasoning

    This sweep is honest but it's telling me the choke branch is the wrong knob. Every one of the 48 candidates converged on the same cell (1.37nF, 8 tubes parallel) and the same 100µH...

  • design note · WFC · · added 1 month ago

    WFC design session v27: reasoning

    This sweep was supposed to hunt the Td sweet spot from below the 1A ceiling by trading cold-pure Q for warmer, slightly-more-conductive water. It did not get me there, and I want t...

  • design note · VIC · · added 1 month ago

    VIC design session v87: reasoning

    Lab note — VIC resonant sweep, 42 candidates, Randles-cell + vapor-film CGDE diagnostic. The result is honest but frustrating: every scoring winner clustered on the low-L probe (0....

  • design note · VIC · · added 1 month ago

    VIC design session v94: reasoning

    Lab note — VIC resonant sweep, Randles + vapor-film scoring. The intent this session was to force f_r up into the untested 32–50 kHz band with 3.7–9 mH high-turn chokes. The honest...

  • design note · VIC · · added 1 month ago

    VIC design session v98: reasoning

    Lab notebook — VIC resonant sweep, film-Td tuning attempt. The headline result is a negative one, and I'll record it plainly: this sweep did NOT hit its target. I set out to pull V...

  • calculation · VIC · · added 1 month ago

    VIC design session v92: best candidate (Q=1.2, 12.9kHz)

    **Sweep** — Force the 1.37nF (1-2 cell) case: sweep per-choke L 3.7-9mH to land f_r across the untested 32-50kHz compliant band, with high-turn AWG18-22 coils to hold coil Q high w...

  • calculation · WFC · · added 1 month ago

    WFC design session v30: best candidate (Q=13.3, 45.7kHz)

    **Sweep** — Freeze near-v19 tank geometry but attack the Td window directly with a fine electrode-gap × length ladder crossed against a low-mid drive ladder (3-10kV V_cell), holdin...

  • design note · VIC · · added 1 month ago

    VIC design session v101: reasoning

    This sweep confirms a tension the scorer doesn't resolve cleanly. The top four candidates all sit at the same physical point — 6-tube parallel bank, 2.81nF, twin 0.5mH chokes, f_r...

  • calculation · WFC · · added 1 month ago

    WFC design session v31: best candidate (Q=20.7, 64.5kHz)

    **Sweep** — Widen annular gap into 6-9mm to slide the 0.1mm vapor film down into the 80-250 Td CGDE window at ~800V cell, holding cold/pure water for high R_ct/Q, and re-check C_ef...