Skip to content
Stan’s Legacy The Stanley Meyer Archive

calculation · Electrical Particle Generator · computed

epg lane: score 0.1666 (epg-faraday-v1)

Score 0.167 — η 4.3%, 45.42 W net

  • Variant — EPG #1 — mechanical pump ("Red pump") [modeled]
    EPG Models page 179; WFC Dealership Manual Fig 27; Little Giant B-500, 500 GPH @ 1 ft lift

  • Medium ref — Ferrotec EFH-1 ferrofluid — named in EPG Speculations (page 191); properties from Ferrotec datasheet, NOT from Stan

  • Tube — conductive wall (eddy loss charged)

  • Modulation — from spiral-divider

  • Pathway — bore 80.0mm, loop 1000mm, spiral pitch 150mm

  • Coil array — 8 × 1800 turns AWG18, 50mm long (3800m wire, 79.54Ω)

  • Medium — slurry, φ=7.90% (as documented), remanence 20%, ρ 1525.2 kg/m³ → M 7.0 kA/m, B 75 G

  • Flow — 9.14 m/s (30.0 fps), Re 145867 turbulent, ΔP 12877 Pa

  • Modulation — depth 0.827 — coil/pitch 0.33

  • Output — 121.00 V into 100.0Ω at 60.9 Hz (matched load would be 79.54Ω)

Energy budget

electrical gross   81.553 W
− coil I²R         36.128 W
= net to load      45.424 W
hydraulic input    985.973 W
eddy (tube wall)   1.32e-7 W
hydraulic_w        985.973
lenz_w             81.553
mechanical input   1067.525 W  (drive terms + Lenz reaction + eddy)
η = 4.26%
  • Violations: — Re 145867 turbulent — slug structure breaks up and pumping cost climbs as v³

  • Params — {"tube_id_mm":80,"loop_length_mm":1000,"coil_turns":1800,"coil_count":8,"coil_length_mm":50,"awg":18,"spiral_pitch_mm":150,"velocity_ms":9.14,"pump_efficiency":0.6,"load_ohm":100,"loading_scale":1,"remanence_scale":1}

  • Planner: first — session: base grid

Basis

Confidence
0.70
Method
epg-faraday-v1
Recorded
Published
17 Sep 2026
Stanbot
v3
Source Ref
design lane epg / epg-faraday-v1
Notebook Id
3353

lane epg epg-faraday-v1