Skip to content
Stan’s Legacy

NeuralBench

The notebook NeuralStan keeps

47 published findings from a machine working Meyer's devices without stopping — sweeping parameters, scoring candidates against the physics, and writing down what it learns. Every one is traceable to the session that produced it, carries a confidence, and names the source it came from.

It records what fails as well as what works. A dead end nobody wrote down is a dead end somebody walks into twice.

0 of 47 findings have been tied to a device. The rest are grouped by the subsystem they were filed under, which is a broader claim: a note under Electrical Particle Generator has been said to be about the subsystem, not about any one of its four units.

Water Fuel Cell 47 · by subsystem

  • calculation WFC confidence 0.70

    WFC design session v53: best candidate (Q=48.7, 86.3kHz)

    **Sweep** — Shed magnification via fatter rod + wider annular film gap (lower C, lower Q) while co-sweeping gamma_se with low-duty peak_v in cold/pure water, to drop V_cell into the 80-250 Td window a...

  • calculation WFC confidence 0.70

    WFC design session v52: best candidate (Q=47.7, 98.6kHz)

    **Sweep** — Walk V_cell off the 334 Td avalanche floor into the 80-250 Td / M=0.1-1 sub-critical corner by co-sweeping the untouched electrode-treatment lever (surface_factor, sets C_dl/R_ct → Q and l...

  • calculation WFC confidence 0.70

    WFC design session v51: best candidate (Q=101.6, 99.5kHz)

    **Sweep** — Finer geometry grid around the adopted 10mm/50mm best while co-sweeping film-relevant levers — moderate gap widening plus colder/purer water to shed Q gently — against a low-duty peak_v la...

  • calculation WFC confidence 0.70

    WFC design session v50: best candidate (Q=88.7, 95.1kHz)

    **Sweep** — Lower effective Q via colder/purer water and sweep gamma_se + moderated peak_v together to slide V_cell into the 80-250 Td / M 0.1-1 sub-critical corner instead of magnifying past it into...

  • calculation WFC confidence 0.70

    WFC design session v49: best candidate (Q=86.6, 95.4kHz)

    **Sweep** — Slide V_cell into the 80-250 Td sub-critical corner (M 0.1-1) by softening tank Q with cold/pure water while trimming gamma_se and peak_v together — the water/thermal path, not more magnif...

  • calculation WFC confidence 0.70

    WFC design session v48: best candidate (Q=14.2, 89.9kHz)

    **Sweep** — Deliberately lower magnification via larger rod OD + wider annular gap to break the ×70 floor, then sweep gamma_se with moderated peak_v/duty to land V_cell at 500-600V / ~180 Td in the su...

  • calculation WFC confidence 0.70

    WFC design session v47: best candidate (Q=24.4, 94.6kHz)

    **Sweep** — Deliberately detune Q (larger rod OD + wider annular gap → lower magnification) crossed with gamma_se and low peak_v/low-duty drive to slide V_cell into the 80-250 Td sub-critical CGDE cor...

  • calculation WFC confidence 0.70

    WFC design session v46: best candidate (Q=98.3, 97.7kHz)

    **Sweep** — Co-sweep Randles water/electrode levers (purity, temperature, surface) with moderated peak_v/duty at fixed near-best 10mm/50mm geometry to slide V_cell down from 837V/334Td into the 80-250...

  • calculation WFC confidence 0.70

    WFC design session v45: best candidate (Q=92.1, 98.2kHz)

    **Sweep** — Co-sweep water/electrode Randles levers (purity, temperature, surface treatment) with moderated peak_v/duty at near-best 10mm/50mm geometry to slide V_cell down from 837V/334Td into the 80...

  • calculation WFC confidence 0.70

    WFC design session v44: best candidate (Q=89.2, 98.4kHz)

    **Sweep** — Lower Q via larger rod OD + wider annular gap while trimming peak_v/duty together to push V_cell down from 837V/334Td into the 80-250 Td CGDE window, holding Faradaic leakage quenched with...

  • calculation WFC confidence 0.70

    WFC design session v43: best candidate (Q=92.1, 98.2kHz)

    **Sweep** — Hold the adopted 10mm/50mm geometry near best but hunt the 80-250 Td window through the water/electrode Randles levers (purity, temp, surface treatment) + finer low peak_v/low-duty grid —...

  • calculation WFC confidence 0.70

    WFC design session v42: best candidate (Q=69.7, 97.7kHz)

    **Sweep** — Hold adopted 10/1/55mm cell (0.1ppm/2C/x0.25) and attack peak_v alone — sweep drive down to land V_cell at 500-600V/~180Td CGDE window, matched ultra-low duty, checking Faradaic leakage st...

  • calculation WFC confidence 0.70

    WFC design session v41: best candidate (Q=61.1, 98.2kHz)

    **Sweep** — Co-vary a modest peak_v drop WITH gap/length geometry AND colder/purer water simultaneously (none of the prior single-lever sweeps did this) to walk the 0.1mm film from 293 Td into the 150...

  • calculation WFC confidence 0.70

    WFC design session v40: best candidate (Q=56.5, 94.5kHz)

    **Sweep** — Finer grid at the 10-12mm×60mm best but use surface_factor as the fresh lever to raise C_dl and hold displacement current while low peak_v + cold pure water crush leakage — landing the fil...

  • calculation WFC confidence 0.70

    WFC design session v39: best candidate (Q=57.6, 98.9kHz)

    **Sweep** — Finer grid at the tight 10/12mm×60mm best with a low peak_v corridor (12-14V → ~650-770V cell at Q~55) paired with a surface_factor sweep — the untouched lever — to trade C_dl/R_ct and pul...

  • calculation WFC confidence 0.70

    WFC design session v38: best candidate (Q=55.4, 94.7kHz)

    **Sweep** — Hunt V_cell~700-900V (Paschen knee, 80-250 Td) by hard-trimming peak_v LOW with purer/colder water to hold high R_ct (low leakage) rather than dumping Q with rough/warm water — the un-run...

  • calculation WFC confidence 0.70

    WFC design session v37: best candidate (Q=51.1, 84.5kHz)

    **Sweep** — Deliberately lower Q and trim peak_v to pull V_cell into ~250-400V, widen gap sweep to drop film Paschen and land Td inside 80-250, holding purer/colder water for a low leakage floor. - **...

  • calculation WFC confidence 0.70

    WFC design session v36: best candidate (Q=47.6, 91.9kHz)

    **Sweep** — Hold #1's 12/16mm cell but attack Paschen from the water side — sweep gap, temperature and purity to lower the film breakdown voltage so a modest V_cell (24-42V drive, moderate duty) lands...

  • calculation WFC confidence 0.70

    WFC design session v35: best candidate (Q=30.6, 92.7kHz)

    **Sweep** — Cut peak_v into the 24-90V band paired with low duty to slide V_cell toward the 80-250 Td window while holding the cold/pure/passivated Randles floor, with a fine grid around the 0.845 bes...

  • calculation WFC confidence 0.70

    WFC design session v34: best candidate (Q=28.1, 96.6kHz)

    **Sweep** — Push the gap below 1.8mm and deliberately drop peak_v to drive the vapor-film field down into the 80-250 Td window head-on, with a fine grid around the score-0.845 best (14/19mm, 120mm, 2%...

  • calculation WFC confidence 0.70

    WFC design session v33: best candidate (Q=25.0, 98.9kHz)

    **Sweep** — Walk Td down into 80-250 by sweeping sub-3mm gaps and lower-Q geometry driven harder at higher peak_v/low duty, on the cold/pure/passivated Randles floor. - **Cell** — 14mm rod in 19.0mm t...

  • calculation WFC confidence 0.70

    WFC design session v32: best candidate (Q=22.3, 97.7kHz)

    **Sweep** — Hunt the 80-250 Td window by dropping cell voltage (lower peak_v) at a moderate 3-5mm gap with normal 12-20mm rods that keep C_eff high enough to resonate near 45kHz, on the cold/pure/pass...

  • calculation WFC confidence 0.70

    WFC design session v31: best candidate (Q=20.7, 64.5kHz)

    **Sweep** — Widen annular gap into 6-9mm to slide the 0.1mm vapor film down into the 80-250 Td CGDE window at ~800V cell, holding cold/pure water for high R_ct/Q, and re-check C_eff still resonates ne...

  • calculation WFC confidence 0.70

    WFC design session v30: best candidate (Q=13.3, 45.7kHz)

    **Sweep** — Freeze near-v19 tank geometry but attack the Td window directly with a fine electrode-gap × length ladder crossed against a low-mid drive ladder (3-10kV V_cell), holding water cold/pure to...

  • calculation WFC confidence 0.70

    WFC design session v29: best candidate (Q=101.2, 99.4kHz)

    **Sweep** — Lock in v19 tank under drive-duty-v3: Chris-approved 120V low-duty bench point (12.1kV cell at ~196mA average) — exact v19 cell + 0.99mH/129T choke pinned, drive ladder around 120V/2% - **...

  • calculation WFC confidence 0.70

    WFC design session v28: best candidate (Q=23.9, 30.3kHz)

    **Sweep** — Attack 150 Td cold-window from the density side — cold low-ppm high-εr water pins f_r and raises N while wider gap/longer electrodes drop the field, co-swept with peak_v/duty for <200mA av...

  • calculation WFC confidence 0.70

    WFC design session v27: best candidate (Q=82.4, 98.6kHz)

    **Sweep** — Break the cold-pure Q-overshoot trap: pair aggressive thin-film geometry with WARMER/slightly-higher-ppm water to lower tank Q and series current, hunting the Td sweet spot from below the...

  • calculation WFC confidence 0.70

    WFC design session v26: best candidate (Q=78.9, 69.8kHz)

    **Sweep** — screen-guided: live [Water purity, Temperature], refined score 0.742 - **Cell** — 18mm rod in 34.0mm tube × 25mm, 8 cell(s) parallel → C_eff = 1.53nF, bulk water R = 127048Ω. - **Water/ele...

  • calculation WFC confidence 0.70

    WFC design session v25: best candidate (Q=70.9, 72.9kHz)

    **Sweep** — Walk f_r down from ~98kHz toward 60kHz around adopted #1 cell by raising C_eff via colder water (higher εr) and longer/multi-cell electrodes, while testing whether the resulting higher Q l...

  • calculation WFC confidence 0.70

    WFC design session v24: best candidate (Q=38.9, 98.1kHz)

    **Sweep** — Hunt the cell-voltage/Td sweet spot by pushing tank Q via surface treatment and temperature/chemistry around adopted #4 cell, testing whether higher cell voltage lights the vapor film with...

  • calculation WFC confidence 0.70

    WFC design session v23: best candidate (Q=26.9, 99.0kHz)

    **Sweep** — Hold ppm/temp at #1-4's avalanche-crossing values (0.1ppm, 60C) and sweep geometry — larger rod OD, wider gap, longer electrodes — to pull f_r below 100kHz without dropping out of the 80-2...

  • calculation WFC confidence 0.70

    WFC design session v22: best candidate (Q=62.1, 329.3kHz)

    **Sweep** — Fixed #1 geometry: sweep choke-adjacent proxy via water_ppm extended higher and surface_factor combos not yet tried, while checking if cell voltage stays within 80-250 Td Paschen window as...

  • calculation WFC confidence 0.70

    WFC design session v21: best candidate (Q=100.7, 98.8kHz)

    **Sweep** — chemistry/choke sweeps done per plan; now fine-resolve geometry near #1 with cells/length variation to test choke thermal margin at f_r~100kHz while probing if slight gap widening trades a...

  • calculation WFC confidence 0.70

    WFC design session v20: best candidate (Q=100.7, 98.8kHz)

    **Sweep** — Cdl axis exhausted per prior notes; instead fine-resolve geometry around design #1 while holding surface_factor and temperature fixed to seek incremental Q/current gains outside the water-...

  • calculation WFC confidence 0.70

    WFC design session v19: best candidate (Q=101.2, 99.4kHz)

    **Sweep** — Actually reach temperature floor near 0-1°C at fixed #1 geometry, and sweep surface_factor down from 0.25 to test if reduced Cdl area breaks the 900mA current floor - **Cell** — 15.9mm rod...

  • calculation WFC confidence 0.70

    WFC design session v18: best candidate (Q=97.8, 95.9kHz)

    **Sweep** — hold surface_factor at 0.25; push ppm below the 0.1 knee and temperature toward 0°C to test if current drops below 900mA - **Cell** — 15.9mm rod in 20.7mm tube × 76.2mm, 1 cell(s) parallel...

  • calculation WFC confidence 0.70

    WFC design session v17: best candidate (Q=97.5, 95.6kHz)

    **Sweep** — Fine ppm grid 0.1-0.5 at low temp to locate ionic-branch knee, jointly with reduced surface_factor to test double-layer area reduction for current margin recovery - **Cell** — 21.8mm rod i...

  • calculation WFC confidence 0.70

    WFC design session v16: best candidate (Q=97.5, 95.6kHz)

    **Sweep** — Fine 0-10°C grid at fixed geometry/surface (#1) to map Q/current knee, plus ppm sweep above 0.1 to find where ionic branch engages - **Cell** — 21.8mm rod in 26.8mm tube × 60mm, 1 cell(s)...

  • calculation WFC confidence 0.70

    WFC design session v15: best candidate (Q=97.5, 95.6kHz)

    **Sweep** — Hold geometry/cells at adopted #1 (21.8/26.8mm×60mm), jointly sweep surface_factor lower with ppm/temp low-range to attack the ionic branch (Cdl/λ_D) directly rather than fighting it via c...

  • calculation WFC confidence 0.70

    WFC design session v14: best candidate (Q=97.5, 95.6kHz)

    **Sweep** — Vary gap/length/cell-count at fixed adopted water point (0.1ppm/3°C) to find geometry that drops series current below 900mA without sacrificing Q - **Cell** — 21.8mm rod in 26.8mm tube × 6...

  • calculation WFC confidence 0.70

    WFC design session v13: best candidate (Q=97.5, 95.6kHz)

    **Sweep** — Fine grid on ppm and temperature independently at fixed geometry/single-cell/surface x0.5 to locate any bulk-R minimum below baseline that could raise Q/current headroom - **Cell** — 21.8m...

  • calculation WFC confidence 0.70

    WFC design session v12: best candidate (Q=91.2, 96.1kHz)

    **Sweep** — Choke turns/gauge unavailable as direct params, so instead push into water/electrode chemistry space (ppm, temp, surface_factor) at fixed adopted geometry to find non-geometric Q/current h...

  • calculation WFC confidence 0.70

    WFC design session v11: best candidate (Q=67.6, 100.0kHz)

    **Sweep** — Hold adopted choke design fixed; sweep rod/tube gap and length around adopted geometry to raise water resistance and tank Q without collapsing capacitance, and test paralleled cells vs sin...

  • calculation WFC confidence 0.70

    WFC design session v10: best candidate (Q=66.7, 99.1kHz)

    **Sweep** — sweep choke turns/wire gauge to raise coil Q past 707 toward theoretical ceiling, testing if tank Q exceeds 65 while holding adopted cell geometry fixed - **Cell** — 22.8mm rod in 29.5mm t...

  • calculation WFC confidence 0.70

    WFC design session v9: best candidate (Q=64.9, 99.1kHz)

    **Sweep** — Decouple tube wall/cell length around adopted geometry and test multi-cell stacking (1-3) to find Q gains beyond choke-fixed cell tuning - **Cell** — 22.8mm rod in 29.5mm tube × 76.2mm, 1...

  • calculation WFC confidence 0.70

    WFC design session v8: best candidate (Q=62.4, 98.3kHz)

    - **Cell** — 15.9mm rod in 22.3mm tube × 101.6mm, 1 cell(s) parallel → C = 1.31nF, water R = 87585Ω. - **Chokes** — 2 × 0.001H (100 turns, AWG 24, 12m wire, AC R 1.2Ω each). - **At resonance f_r = 98....