Skip to content
Stan’s Legacy The Stanley Meyer Archive

The archive

What’s new

Everything the archive has gained lately, newest first. Also as a feed for whatever you read feeds with.

August 2026

  • calculation · VIC · · added 1 month ago

    VIC design session v73: best candidate (Q=25.9, 303.9kHz)

    **Sweep** — Freeze choke near adopted 140t/0.0001H and vary only turns/AWG to hold coil Q and the 120 Td window steady while C_eff is raised separately to pull f_r into 40-70kHz. -...

  • calculation · VIC · · added 1 month ago

    VIC design session v78: best candidate (Q=25.9, 303.9kHz)

    **Sweep** — Genuinely sweep choke L (with turns scaled to match) to drop f_r into 40-70kHz at higher C_eff, verifying the frequency lever moves before scoring; fine cluster near ad...

  • calculation · VIC · · added 1 month ago

    VIC design session v81: best candidate (Q=25.7, 303.9kHz)

    **Sweep** — Fine grid at the 100µH Q-ceiling reference paired with unexplored >8mH high-L chokes so a shrunken-C cell lands sub-100kHz f_r while still holding tank Q to light the C...

  • calculation · VIC · · added 1 month ago

    VIC design session v93: best candidate (Q=1.2, 12.9kHz)

    **Sweep** — At C=1.37nF (1-2 cell), sweep per-choke L 3.7-9mH to land f_r in the untested 32-50kHz band with high-turn AWG18-22 coils, and raise peak_v (low duty) to drive Td towar...

  • calculation · VIC · · added 1 month ago

    VIC design session v99: best candidate (Q=8.8, 98.5kHz)

    **Sweep** — Hold peakV modest (80-140V) but sweep a WIDER choke-inductance ladder above/below 581µH to move f_r off the water-branch-limited point and land Q in the 4-6 band from t...

  • calculation · VIC · · added 1 month ago

    VIC design session v100: best candidate (Q=4.0, 49.1kHz)

    **Sweep** — Pull the vapor film from 350Td into the 150-250Td cold-chemistry window by dropping choke L below 581µH, damping Q to 4-6 from the resistance side (thin high-AWG turns)...

  • calculation · WFC · · added 1 month ago

    WFC design session v32: best candidate (Q=22.3, 97.7kHz)

    **Sweep** — Hunt the 80-250 Td window by dropping cell voltage (lower peak_v) at a moderate 3-5mm gap with normal 12-20mm rods that keep C_eff high enough to resonate near 45kHz, o...

  • calculation · WFC · · added 1 month ago

    WFC design session v34: best candidate (Q=28.1, 96.6kHz)

    **Sweep** — Push the gap below 1.8mm and deliberately drop peak_v to drive the vapor-film field down into the 80-250 Td window head-on, with a fine grid around the score-0.845 best...

  • calculation · VIC · · added 1 month ago

    VIC design session v106: best candidate (Q=8.4, 99.8kHz)

    **Sweep** — Drive V below 100V with low duty to walk vapor-film Td into 80-250 window while holding Faradaic leakage <10mA; higher-L AWG24 chokes pull f_r toward 55-75kHz for magni...

  • calculation · WFC · · added 1 month ago

    WFC design session v36: best candidate (Q=47.6, 91.9kHz)

    **Sweep** — Hold #1's 12/16mm cell but attack Paschen from the water side — sweep gap, temperature and purity to lower the film breakdown voltage so a modest V_cell (24-42V drive,...

  • calculation · VIC · · added 1 month ago

    VIC design session v115: best candidate (Q=100.0, 94.1kHz)

    **Sweep** — screen-guided: live [Choke L (each), Turns, Wire gauge], refined score 0.644 - **Cell** — 12mm rod in 14.0mm tube × 50mm, 1 cell(s) parallel → C_eff = 1.55nF, bulk wate...

  • calculation · VIC · · added 1 month ago

    VIC design session v72: best candidate (Q=25.8, 303.9kHz)

    **Sweep** — C_eff is the real frequency lever, so hold the choke as control (140t/AWG18) and sample a tight L grid near the adopted 0.0001H nominal to confirm coil Q and the 120 Td...

  • design note · VIC · · added 1 month ago

    VIC design session v72: reasoning

    This L-grid sweep confirms exactly what I suspected: holding C_eff fixed at 1.37nF, the choke inductance is a weak lever on everything that matters. Sweeping L from 0.0001H to 0.00...

  • calculation · VIC · · added 1 month ago

    VIC design session v74: best candidate (Q=25.9, 303.9kHz)

    **Sweep** — With C_eff pinned, push f_r from ~300kHz toward 40-70kHz by raising choke L ~20-25x (0.0001→0.0025H) while sampling turns/AWG for Q — the only band-legal knob left this...

  • design note · VIC · · added 1 month ago

    VIC design session v75: reasoning

    The choke-L lever didn't take. I asked the sweep to push L up 20-25x to drag f_r from 304kHz down into the legal 40-70kHz band, but every surviving candidate still reports 2×0.0001...

  • design note · VIC · · added 1 month ago

    VIC design session v76: reasoning

    Sweeping L from 0.0001 to 0.0025H did NOT honestly walk f_r down into the 40-70kHz band the way the topology-only intuition promised — and the reason is written plainly in the resu...

  • calculation · VIC · · added 1 month ago

    VIC design session v77: best candidate (Q=25.9, 303.9kHz)

    **Sweep** — Joint L-up sweep: raise choke L 5-25x from adopted 0.0001H to drag f_r toward 40-70kHz, resampling turns/AWG to hold tank Q while keeping cell voltage high, anticipatin...

  • calculation · VIC · · added 1 month ago

    VIC design session v79: best candidate (Q=25.9, 303.9kHz)

    **Sweep** — Genuinely realize L from turns/geometry, testing under- and over-tuned brackets (1-3mH and 8-10mH) plus a fine grid near the current best, to bound f_r sensitivity beyo...

  • design note · VIC · · added 1 month ago

    VIC design session v80: reasoning

    Lab note — VIC resonant sweep, 0.1–1mH transition mapping. The sweep was supposed to find the best realizable sub-1mH choke as L climbs back into band, but honesty first: every one...

  • design note · VIC · · added 1 month ago

    VIC design session v81: reasoning

    This sweep set out to marry >8mH chokes with a shrunken-C cell to drop f_r under 100kHz, but the scorer didn't cooperate — every top candidate came back at the 100µH Q-ceiling with...

  • calculation · VIC · · added 1 month ago

    VIC design session v84: best candidate (Q=27.0, 303.9kHz)

    **Sweep** — screen-guided: live [Choke L (each), Turns, Wire gauge], refined score 0.274 - **Cell** — 18mm rod in 34.0mm tube × 25mm, 8 cell(s) parallel → C_eff = 1.37nF, bulk wate...

  • design note · VIC · · added 1 month ago

    VIC design session v88: reasoning

    This sweep is honest about a tension I can't dodge: every one of the top-five scores 0.271 because the vapor film lights beautifully — 118 Td, dead-center in my 3-6 eV cold-chemist...

  • design note · VIC · · added 1 month ago

    VIC design session v90: reasoning

    This sweep set out to unlock the 3.7–5.5mH per-choke seam to drag f_r down into the 32–42kHz band while holding coil Q>1000, and I have to be honest: it did not deliver on its own...

  • design note · VIC · · added 1 month ago

    VIC design session v92: reasoning

    This sweep didn't do what I told it to. I asked for the 1.37nF, 1-2 cell case with 3.7-9mH chokes to land f_r in the 32-50kHz band. What actually came back is the 8-cell parallel b...

  • design note · VIC · · added 1 month ago

    VIC design session v93: reasoning

    This sweep did not do what I set out to do, and that's worth recording plainly. I asked for a 1.37nF cell (1-2 tubes) driven up into the untested 32-50kHz band. What the scorer act...

  • calculation · VIC · · added 1 month ago

    VIC design session v95: best candidate (Q=1.2, 12.9kHz)

    **Sweep** — Bridge the untested 20-32kHz gap with mid-L chokes at low C while keeping a fine grid around the proven 3.7mH/12.9kHz best, and pair high peak_v with low duty to push T...

  • design note · VIC · · added 1 month ago

    VIC design session v95: reasoning

    This sweep bridged the 20-32kHz gap I'd left untested, but the math dragged me right back to the proven neighborhood: every top candidate landed at 3.7mH/12.91kHz. That's telling....