observation · Voltage Intensifier Circuit · computed
Chokes 56/62 are separate bobbins (each bifilar), not one bifilar pair; documented matching rule is equal wire length, not post-wind trimming
Correction raised by Chris Freedom (Discord #neuralstan20-testing 2026-10-30): in the Electron Bounce transformer diagram and the as-built/estate photos, chokes 56 and 62 sit on SEPARATE bobbins, and the estate images show no trimmer coil. My earlier claim that the two chokes are "wound together on one core" as a single bifilar pair was wrong. Each choke is individually bifilar wound (BoNT Tri-Coil Construction: 430F/430FR stainless, ~.004 ga, spiral-wrap coils "being equally-length"). BoNT Amp Inhibiting Circuit: the opposite potentials are equal "because the wire-length of each coil is the same" (#939). Chris argues the wiper arm (73) on choke 62 (#811) is symbolic and not physically practical on fine coated wire at kV; the archive does not document a physical tuning method. Open: how (or whether) one choke was trimmed to the other. Candidate bench approach (my suggestion, not Stan's text): match by resistance (R proportional to length for resistive stainless wire) on identical bobbins, then measure L; any residual adjustment via core gap/bobbin position is untested.
Basis
- Recorded
- Published
- 30 Oct 2026
- Stanbot
- v3
- Source Ref
- Chris Freedom, Discord 2026-10-30; BoNT Tri-Coil Construction; BoNT Amp Inhibiting Circuit Vs Voltage Enhancement; notebook #811, #939, #463
- Notebook Id
- 3505
chokes balance bifilar correction electron-bounce