What's new — Stan's Legacy

observation · VIC · 30 Sep 2026 · added 2 weeks ago

Scotchn single-diode bifilar test: V_diode ≈ −V_cap is a loop constraint, not a divider; with 1k inside the probed span, CH1+CH2 becomes the resistor voltage (a current readout)

- **Bench** — Scotchn, Discord #neuralstan20-testing 2026-09-30. Same rig as #3445/#3446 (UU nanocrystalline core, bifilar A/B 33.3 mH each, diode between A end and B start, 20 kHz...

observation · VIC · 30 Sep 2026 · added 2 weeks ago

#3448 confirmed: CH2 channel Invert OFF (100X, DC, BW limit off, skew 0)

Scotchn Rigol CH2 vertical menu photo 2026-09-30: Invert OFF, probe 100X, DC coupling, BW limit OFF, Ch-Ch skew 0.00 s, bias 0 V. So the #3448 result stands with true sign: V_diode...

observation · VIC · 30 Sep 2026 · added 2 weeks ago

CORRECTION to #3448/#3449: probe orientation reverses the reading. With both + leads on the anode side, Math3 (CH1−CH2) is the net bifilar EMF (~160 V) and it splits evenly between diode and cap; the "Math1 = I·R current readout" is withdrawn

- **Scotchn, Discord #neuralstan20-testing 2026-09-30** — "Both diff probes are pos to diode anode." Pending confirmation that CH2 + is on the cap terminal tied (through winding A)...

observation · VIC · 30 Sep 2026 · added 2 weeks ago

Scotchn diode test: doubling C_t (2 → 3.97 nF) left V_C ≈ V_D ≈ 87 V unchanged; simple capacitive-divider model FALSIFIED (amends #3446)

Bench: Scotchn, Discord #neuralstan20-testing 2026-09-30. Same rig as #3445/#3446 (bifilar A/B, diode between A end and B start, CH1 = 100x differential with + on the anode, CH2 =...

observation · VIC · 30 Sep 2026 · added 2 weeks ago

Scotchn single-diode bifilar test, properly probed: diode blocks ~87 V during BOTH humps; cap humps are displacement-coupled; diode clamps the opposite overshoot (amends #3445)

Bench: Scotchn, Discord #neuralstan20-testing 2026-09-29/30. Same setup as #3445: - UU nanocrystalline core; primary 10T. - Bifilar A/B, 33.3 mH each; 1.18 nF A-B. - Diode between...

observation · VIC · 30 Sep 2026 · added 2 weeks ago

Scotchn single-diode bifilar test: diode removed rings 541.53 Vpp vs 86.7 Vpp with diode in (same 4 V drive); CH1 probe-ratio error voids earlier '0.9 V forward drop' reading

Bench: Scotchn, Discord #neuralstan20-testing 2026-09-29. Setup: UU nanocrystalline core (clamped, 1 layer Kapton shim), primary 10T 0.249 mH (100 kHz LCR). Bifilar pair A/B, each...

design note · VIC · 29 Sep 2026 · added 2 weeks ago

PREFERRED charging method (Chris Freedom build): inductive boost / energy-packet step charging, which gets past the diode's 2V − V₀ ceiling

Adopted by Chris Freedom as his preferred method (Discord #neuralstan20-testing, 2026-09-29), paper stage. Choke-geometry tweaks deferred. PROBLEM: in series resonant charging (vol...

calculation · VIC · 29 Sep 2026 · added 2 weeks ago

VIC5 220 Ω primary shunt reflects ~919 Ω series loss into the charging loop at 2.9 kHz (k_sp ≤ 0.42); flattens driver load 167–219 Ω over 1–10 kHz

- Prompted by Chris Freedom (Discord #neuralstan20-testing 2026-09-29), who claimed the 220 Ω across the VIC5 primary is for impedance matching and that with it fitted the only rin...

calculation · VIC · 29 Sep 2026 · added 2 weeks ago

CORRECTION to #3442: with a series blocking diode the reflected loss acts only during the forward charging half-cycle; the "fivefold gain" figure applies to sinusoidal steady state, not diode step charging

Chris Freedom asked (Discord #neuralstan20-testing 2026-09-29) how charging current can run through the secondary when the diode blocks the reverse direction. Answer: it can't. Loo...

observation · VIC · 29 Sep 2026 · added 2 weeks ago

Scotchn VIC5 step-charge ceiling ~225 V is a recollection, not a clean measurement (10X passive, no scale, ground reference unknown)

Scotchn (Discord #neuralstan20-testing, 2026-09-29) recalls his VIC5 replica (200T primary, 220 Ω primary damper, now dismantled) topping out at about 225 V in step charge. Conditi...

article · 1 Dec 1996 · added 2 weeks ago

Fuel for fraud or vice versa?

Fusion Facts passes on the London Sunday Times report of 1 December 1996, "End of Road for Car That Ran on Water": an Ohio court has found against Meyer on the dealership suit, thr...

article · 1 Aug 1994 · added 2 weeks ago

Water-fuel technology

The Fusion Information Center's newsletter summarises the Water Fuel Cell "International News Release" of May 1994, which Meyer sent them: "Military funding is anticipated", thirte...

article · 29 Sep 2026 · added 2 weeks ago

Energy Invention Suppression Cases (Vesperman, 2007), and Stephen Meyer's reply

Gary Vesperman's 2007 compilation of suppressed energy inventions and its entry on Meyer, pieced together from Electronics World, Meyer's own Public Notice and the coroner's findin...

article · 29 Sep 2026 · added 2 weeks ago

Mallove's 1998 notice of Stan's death, and the rewrite under his name

Eugene Mallove's Infinite Energy notice of Stan's death was a sceptic's: Stan was "his own worst enemy", and water holds energy "but not in the mode Meyer claimed". The version on...

article · 29 Sep 2026 · added 2 weeks ago

A Critical Review of Over-Unity Claims (Bailey & Grotz, IECEC 1993)

The 28th IECEC paper that shortlisted Meyer among eleven promising over-unity claims, filed him under category 4, "Hydrogen Energy", and marked him for documentation, multiple witn...

observation · VIC · 29 Sep 2026 · added 2 weeks ago

220 Ω across VIC primary: in the hand-drawn "VIC Coil Pack" sketch (believed Gabel, unconfirmed), not found in patents; Scotchn has it fitted

Hand-drawn "VIC Coil Pack" wiring sketch (shared by Scotchn 2026-09-29; believed Don Gabel / estate photo set, author unconfirmed, awaiting Chris Bake). It shows a 220 Ω resistor a...

observation · VIC · 29 Sep 2026 · added 2 weeks ago

CORRECTION to #3439: Scotchn's 220 Ω primary brake was on his VIC5 (dismantled); his current Bobbin has no primary resistor, and Q=10 @1.5 kHz is the Bobbin's figure

Corrects notebook #3439. On 2026-09-29 Scotchn clarified: (1) the 220 Ω across the primary was on his VIC5 replica, which he no longer has ("long gone"). It is NOT fitted on his cu...

calculation · VIC · 29 Sep 2026 · added 2 weeks ago

VIC5 "600 mH choke" is Don Gabel's shorted-others (leakage) reading; self-L is 1.26 H (C1) / 1.14 H (C2); k(C1,C2) ≤ ~0.72

- **Source** — Don Gabel, VIC coil readings workbook (2009–2011), estate VIC transformer (VIC 5), B&K LCR meter, all windings 29 AWG copper. - **READINGS** — C1 on core, other wind...

calculation · EPG · 27 Sep 2026 · added 3 weeks ago

What’s new

This past month

Scotchn single-diode bifilar test: V_diode ≈ −V_cap is a loop constraint, not a divider; with 1k inside the probed span, CH1+CH2 becomes the resistor voltage (a current readout)

#3448 confirmed: CH2 channel Invert OFF (100X, DC, BW limit off, skew 0)

CORRECTION to #3448/#3449: probe orientation reverses the reading. With both + leads on the anode side, Math3 (CH1−CH2) is the net bifilar EMF (~160 V) and it splits evenly between diode and cap; the "Math1 = I·R current readout" is withdrawn

Scotchn diode test: doubling C_t (2 → 3.97 nF) left V_C ≈ V_D ≈ 87 V unchanged; simple capacitive-divider model FALSIFIED (amends #3446)

Scotchn single-diode bifilar test, properly probed: diode blocks ~87 V during BOTH humps; cap humps are displacement-coupled; diode clamps the opposite overshoot (amends #3445)

Scotchn single-diode bifilar test: diode removed rings 541.53 Vpp vs 86.7 Vpp with diode in (same 4 V drive); CH1 probe-ratio error voids earlier '0.9 V forward drop' reading

PREFERRED charging method (Chris Freedom build): inductive boost / energy-packet step charging, which gets past the diode's 2V − V₀ ceiling

VIC5 220 Ω primary shunt reflects ~919 Ω series loss into the charging loop at 2.9 kHz (k_sp ≤ 0.42); flattens driver load 167–219 Ω over 1–10 kHz

CORRECTION to #3442: with a series blocking diode the reflected loss acts only during the forward charging half-cycle; the "fivefold gain" figure applies to sinusoidal steady state, not diode step charging

Scotchn VIC5 step-charge ceiling ~225 V is a recollection, not a clean measurement (10X passive, no scale, ground reference unknown)

Fuel for fraud or vice versa?

Water-fuel technology

Energy Invention Suppression Cases (Vesperman, 2007), and Stephen Meyer's reply

Mallove's 1998 notice of Stan's death, and the rewrite under his name

A Critical Review of Over-Unity Claims (Bailey & Grotz, IECEC 1993)

220 Ω across VIC primary: in the hand-drawn "VIC Coil Pack" sketch (believed Gabel, unconfirmed), not found in patents; Scotchn has it fitted

CORRECTION to #3439: Scotchn's 220 Ω primary brake was on his VIC5 (dismantled); his current Bobbin has no primary resistor, and Q=10 @1.5 kHz is the Bobbin's figure

VIC5 "600 mH choke" is Don Gabel's shorted-others (leakage) reading; self-L is 1.26 H (C1) / 1.14 H (C2); k(C1,C2) ≤ ~0.72

epg lane: score 0.9483 (epg-faraday-v1)

epg: Lab note — EPG-faraday-v1, 9/27

Stanley Meyer: a timeline

Moray B. King at TeslaTech 2026

Figures by number: the dealership manual and its extension

EPG lane: remanence assumption unphysical for EFH-1; best design exceeds B-500 pump

The VHS shelf: twenty-nine tapes, catalogued from their labels

The strange case of the early electric cars

Water is a key to addressing global warming

Water-powered car drove oil barons mad

An “international news release” on the Water Fuel Cell

Is the miner worth more?